- From: David Hull <dmh@tibco.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 12:01:23 -0400
- To: Marc Hadley <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM>
- Cc: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>, public-ws-addressing@w3.org
Marc Hadley wrote: > On Oct 9, 2006, at 8:29 PM, Doug Davis wrote: >> >> Also, let's not forget that WSA's definition is pretty clear that >> anon means the _current_ backchannel. RM's anon URI allows for the >> messages to flow over a subsequent backchannel - this is a change to >> the semantics of Anon. Doesn't seem like having a ref-p or some >> wsa:RelatesTo change those semantics is kosher. > > The WS-A ReplyTo applies to the current SOAP message, not some > application-level concept of a reply As far as I can tell, we don't define replies at all beyond saying how to formulate them, that the the [reply endpoint] is the destination for them, and that anon [reply endpoint] means to use the current SOAP response.
Received on Tuesday, 10 October 2006 16:01:50 UTC