- From: David Illsley <david.illsley@uk.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 10:44:52 +0100
- To: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
A number of the tests in the wsdl testsuite [1] (11100, 11131, 11134, 11140) expect and ActionNotSupported Fault to be thrown if the wsa:Action in an inbound message does match that which would have been generated per the rules in the WSDL binding document. The SOAP Binding doc states that the ActionNotSupported fault is optional [2]. I have read this to mean that if a server can still make sense of a message despite an incorrect wsa:Action it should be free to do so. This is how I have implemented this and means that the IBM implementation is currently failing test11134 (the runtime can dispatch based on the body in this case). I'd like to check that the working group is happy that this is a correct interpretation (if not I think we need to open an issue and close it formally). Further, if this is a correct interpretation I'd like agreement that those tests listed above all be marked optional rather than required. Cheers, David [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/testsuitewsdl/testcases/ [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-ws-addr-soap-20060509/#actionfault David Illsley Web Services Development MP127, IBM Hursley Park, SO21 2JN +44 (0)1962 815049 (Int. 245049) david.illsley@uk.ibm.com
Received on Monday, 31 July 2006 12:49:50 UTC