RE: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc

Thanks Mark,

I've just posted such a thing for 202.  

I'll point out that I found your responses quite helpful and clear.
More pointedly, you suggested "allow a response" rather than the some of
the other extreme responses, aka the one-way binding will cause
volcanoes to cover the earth.

Cheers,
Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mbaker@gmail.com [mailto:mbaker@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Mark
Baker
> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 11:41 AM
> To: David Orchard
> Cc: Christopher B Ferris; WS-Addressing
> Subject: Re: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc
> 
> On 1/20/06, David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com> wrote:
> > So y'all are looking for a binding that says a 202 is allowed and if
so,
> > the response may or may not contain a SOAP envelope.  It's the
> > preclusion of the soap envelope that's the problem?
> 
> From my POV, yep!
> 
> Mark.

Received on Monday, 23 January 2006 19:21:21 UTC