- From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 11:44:05 -0800
- To: "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>
- Cc: "Christopher B Ferris" <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>, "WS-Addressing" <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Sounds like it's a request-optional response HTTP binding that y'all are looking for. Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: mbaker@gmail.com [mailto:mbaker@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Mark Baker > Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 11:41 AM > To: David Orchard > Cc: Christopher B Ferris; WS-Addressing > Subject: Re: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc > > On 1/20/06, David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com> wrote: > > So y'all are looking for a binding that says a 202 is allowed and if so, > > the response may or may not contain a SOAP envelope. It's the > > preclusion of the soap envelope that's the problem? > > From my POV, yep! > > Mark.
Received on Friday, 20 January 2006 19:44:34 UTC