public-ws-addressing@w3.org from February 2006 by date

Tuesday, 28 February 2006

WS-Desc comments on WS-A WSDL Binding LC Jonathan Marsh

Monday, 27 February 2006

Action item for cr23: cr15 resolution nullified cr4 resolution: UPDATED proposed text Katy Warr

Friday, 24 February 2006

RE: Encrytping WS-A headers Abbie Barbir
RE: Encrytping WS-A headers Vikas Deolaliker

Thursday, 23 February 2006

Dreaft Agenda, WS-A f2f Mar 2-3 2006 Bob Freund-Hitachi
Re: Encrytping WS-A headers Michael McIntosh
Encrytping WS-A headers Arun Gupta
Re: Draft Minutes 2006-02-20 distributed meeting David Hull
CR 23 omnibus David Hull
RE: Clarification for WS-RX Yalcinalp, Umit
Re: Clarification for WS-RX Christopher B Ferris

Wednesday, 22 February 2006

RE: Clarification for WS-RX Rogers, Tony
Re: Clarification for WS-RX David Hull
Re: Clarification for WS-RX Christopher B Ferris
Re: Clarification for WS-RX David Hull
Re: Action item for cr23: cr15 resolution nullified cr4 resolution: proposed text David Hull
RE: Clarification for WS-RX Christopher B Ferris
RE: Clarification for WS-RX Yalcinalp, Umit
Draft Minutes 2006-02-20 distributed meeting Bob Freund-Hitachi
RE: Clarification for WS-RX David Orchard
Re: Clarification for WS-RX David Hull
RE: Testing result update Jonathan Marsh
RE: Clarification for WS-RX paul.downey@bt.com
Action item for cr23: cr15 resolution nullified cr4 resolution: proposed text Katy Warr

Tuesday, 21 February 2006

Text for "except as a consequence of section 3.4" David Hull
Testing result update Jonathan Marsh
Re: Clarification for WS-RX Christopher B Ferris
Re: Clarification for WS-RX David Hull
Re: Clarification for WS-RX Christopher B Ferris
Re: Clarification for WS-RX Anish Karmarkar
Clarification for WS-RX David Hull
Re: Contradiction in WSDL Binding Hugo Haas
Re: Why anonymous may be different (for AcksTo and elsewhere) David Hull
Re: Why anonymous may be different (for AcksTo and elsewhere) Christopher B Ferris
Re: Why anonymous may be different (for AcksTo and elsewhere) David Hull
Re: Why anonymous may be different (for AcksTo and elsewhere) David Hull
Re: Why anonymous may be different (for AcksTo and elsewhere) David Hull
RE: Why anonymous may be different (for AcksTo and elsewhere) Christopher B Ferris
Re: Why anonymous may be different (for AcksTo and elsewhere) Doug Davis
Re: Why anonymous may be different (for AcksTo and elsewhere) Christopher B Ferris
Re: Contradiction in WSDL Binding David Illsley
Contradiction in WSDL Binding Rogers, Tony
RE: Why anonymous may be different (for AcksTo and elsewhere) Rogers, Tony
Why anonymous may be different (for AcksTo and elsewhere) David Hull

Monday, 20 February 2006

Re: Was resolution of CR4 nullified by resolution of CR15? David Hull
Re: Was resolution of CR4 nullified by resolution of CR15? Anish Karmarkar
Re: CR 20: amalgamated proposal Anish Karmarkar
Regrets for today's teleconference Francisco Curbera
Agenda, WS-Addressing distributed meeting 2006-02-20 16:00 eastern Bob Freund-Hitachi

Friday, 17 February 2006

Transition announcement, WS-Addressing 1.0 WSDL Binding to Last Call Working Draft Bob Freund-Hitachi
Re: Was resolution of CR4 nullified by resolution of CR15? David Hull
Re: WS-Addressing, minutes of the 2006-02-13 distributed meeting Hugo Haas
Re: CR 20: amalgamated proposal Hugo Haas
Re: CR 20: amalgamated proposal Marc Hadley
RE: WS-Addressing, minutes of the 2006-02-13 distributed meeting paul.downey@bt.com
RE: CR 20: amalgamated proposal Francisco Curbera
RE: CR 20: amalgamated proposal Francisco Curbera
RE: CR 20: amalgamated proposal Rogers, Tony
RE: CR 20: amalgamated proposal Rogers, Tony

Thursday, 16 February 2006

Re: CR 20: amalgamated proposal Anish Karmarkar
RE: CR 20: amalgamated proposal Jonathan Marsh
RE: CR 20: amalgamated proposal Jonathan Marsh
Re: CR 20: amalgamated proposal Marc Hadley
Re: CR 20: amalgamated proposal David Hull
CR 20: amalgamated proposal Anish Karmarkar
RE: Wordsmithing for SOAP 1.1 request optional response HTTP Binding. Yalcinalp, Umit

Tuesday, 14 February 2006

RE: Wordsmithing for SOAP 1.1 request optional response HTTP Binding. David Orchard
Re: Wordsmithing for SOAP 1.1 request optional response HTTP Binding. Anish Karmarkar
Re: Wordsmithing for SOAP 1.1 request optional response HTTP Binding. Marc Hadley
Re: Minor editorial points to WSDL spec Katy Warr
WS-Addressing, minutes of the 2006-02-13 distributed meeting Bob Freund-Hitachi
Re: Wordsmithing for SOAP 1.1 request optional response HTTP Binding. Mark Baker
RE: Was resolution of CR4 nullified by resolution of CR15? Yalcinalp, Umit
Was resolution of CR4 nullified by resolution of CR15? Anish Karmarkar

Monday, 13 February 2006

Re: Wordsmithing for SOAP 1.1 request optional response HTTP Binding. Anish Karmarkar
Re: CR20 proposal (consistent wording) David Hull
RE: Wordsmithing for SOAP 1.1 request optional response HTTP Binding. David Orchard
Re: Wordsmithing for SOAP 1.1 request optional response HTTP Binding. Anish Karmarkar
Re: CR20 proposal (consistent wording) David Hull
RE: Wordsmithing for SOAP 1.1 request optional response HTTP Binding. David Orchard
Re: CR20 proposal (consistent wording) Francisco Curbera
Re: Wordsmithing for SOAP 1.1 request optional response HTTP Binding. Anish Karmarkar
Re: CR20: proposal 4a (crisper version) Anish Karmarkar
Wordsmithing for SOAP 1.1 request optional response HTTP Binding. David Orchard
Re: CR20 proposal (consistent wording) David Hull
RE: WSA From Francisco Curbera
RE: CR20: proposal 4a (crisper version) Jonathan Marsh
RE: WSA From David Orchard
RE: CR20 proposal (consistent wording) Jonathan Marsh
Re: WSA From Francisco Curbera
Re: Minor editorial points to WSDL spec Marc Hadley
Re: CR20 proposal Mark Baker
Re: WSA From John Kemp
Re: CR20: proposal 4a (crisper version) David Hull
RE: Proposed text for CR18 paul.downey@bt.com
Testing Call Eran Chinthaka
CR20: proposal 4a (crisper version) Anish Karmarkar
Re: Why we shouldn't make [destination] optional Anish Karmarkar
Re: CR20 proposal (consistent wording) David Hull
Re: CR20 proposal Francisco Curbera

Sunday, 12 February 2006

WS-Addressing: Agenda, 2006-02-13 distributed meeting Bob Freund-Hitachi
Re: CR20 proposal David Hull
Re: WSA From Francisco Curbera
CR20 proposal Francisco Curbera
Re: Proposed text for CR18 Francisco Curbera

Saturday, 11 February 2006

Re: WSA From David Hull
Re: WSA From Mark Baker
RE: WSA From Cahill, Conor P
RE: New Issue: Strengthen guidance on protocol-specifc fault action values Jonathan Marsh

Friday, 10 February 2006

Thursday, 9 February 2006

Re: Choices for CR 20 Mark Baker
Re: WSA From Mark Baker
RE: WSA From Christopher B Ferris
Re: WSA From Doug Davis
Re: WSA From Mark Nottingham
Re: WSA From Doug Davis
Re: WSA From Mark Nottingham
RE: WSA From John Kemp
Re: WSA From Anish Karmarkar
Re: New Issue: Strengthen guidance on protocol-specifc fault action values Mark Nottingham
Re: Proposed text for CR18 David Hull
Re: WSA From Doug Davis
Re: WSA From Mark Little
Re: WSA From Mark Nottingham
Why we shouldn't make [destination] optional David Hull
Proposed text for CR18 paul.downey@bt.com
Re: WSA From Paul Fremantle

Wednesday, 8 February 2006

CR 18 options, CR 20 options and chad David Hull
Choices for CR 20 David Hull
Re: WSA From Tom Rutt
Choices for CR 18 David Hull
RE: WSA From Conor P. Cahill
Re: WSA From Mark Little
Re: WSA From Paul Fremantle
RE: WSA From Cahill, Conor P
Re: WSA From Mark Little
Re: Clarification on MessageId Eran Chinthaka

Tuesday, 7 February 2006

WSA From Paul Fremantle
Typo in latest Editor's draft Davanum Srinivas
Re: Clarification on MessageId Christopher B Ferris
Re: Clarification on MessageId Davanum Srinivas
Re: Clarification on MessageId Prasad Yendluri
Re: CR20 Francisco Curbera
Minutes of the February 6 ws-Addressing meeting are ready for review Bob Freund-Hitachi
RE: Clarification on MessageId Christopher B Ferris
RE: Clarification on MessageId paul.downey@bt.com
Re: Clarification on MessageId Eran Chinthaka
RE: Clarification on MessageId Rogers, Tony
Clarification on MessageId Eran Chinthaka
Re: (possible) WS-RX use cases Anish Karmarkar

Monday, 6 February 2006

Re: CR20 David Hull
RE: (possible) WS-RX use cases paul.downey@bt.com
Re: (possible) WS-RX use cases Christopher B Ferris
Re: (possible) WS-RX use cases Anish Karmarkar
New Issue: Strengthen guidance on protocol-specifc fault action values Jonathan Marsh
Re: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc Anish Karmarkar
Re: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc Anish Karmarkar
Re: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc Anish Karmarkar
Re: CR20 Anish Karmarkar
Regrets for Next Three Calls (2/6, 2/13, 2/20) Mike Vernal
Re: CR20 David Hull
CR20 Francisco Curbera
Re: CR 18: Proposal David Hull

Friday, 3 February 2006

Fw: Removal of Source Endpoint (wsa:From) - Feedback Waris, Faisal \(F.\)
Re: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc Mark Baker
Agenda: WS-A telecon Feb 6 2006 Bob Freund-Hitachi
RE: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc Glen Daniels

Thursday, 2 February 2006

Re: (possible) WS-RX use cases David Hull
Re: (possible) WS-RX use cases Christopher B Ferris
Re: (possible) WS-RX use cases David Hull
RE: (possible) WS-RX use cases paul.downey@bt.com
Re: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc Mark Baker
Re: (possible) WS-RX use cases Christopher B Ferris
RE: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc David Orchard
(possible) WS-RX use cases David Hull
Re: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc Christopher B Ferris
Re: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc Marc Hadley
RE: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc David Orchard
Minutes of Jan 20 meeting are ready for review Bob Freund-Hitachi

Wednesday, 1 February 2006

Re: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc Anish Karmarkar
one-way over request-response over one-way over ... David Hull
Re: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc Christopher B Ferris
Re: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc Marc Hadley
Re: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc Rich Salz
Re: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc Anish Karmarkar
Re: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc Anish Karmarkar
Re: XMLP telcon agenda, 1 Feb 2006 David Hull

Last message date: Tuesday, 28 February 2006 11:14:09 UTC