- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 10:14:47 -0400
- To: "Christopher B Ferris" <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: "Alastair Green" <alastair.green@choreology.com>, public-ws-addressing@w3.org, public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org, ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
On 8/9/06, Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > Alistair, > > > > If you say there is no reply, then you are saying: don't send a > > response. > > Again, the SOAP-level is distinct from the transfer/transport-level. They > are NOT at all related. > It is only that many assume that they are, when in fact, they are not. The default SOAP 1.2 HTTP binding makes no distinction between "SOAP level" and "underlying protocol level"; from its POV, it's all one big happy level. HTTP responses are SOAP responses. Mark.
Received on Wednesday, 9 August 2006 14:15:09 UTC