Wednesday, 30 August 2006
Monday, 28 August 2006
Friday, 25 August 2006
Thursday, 24 August 2006
Wednesday, 23 August 2006
Tuesday, 22 August 2006
Monday, 21 August 2006
- Agenda, 2006-08-21 distributed meeting
 - Changes to the combinations of wsaw:Anonymous / ReplyTo / FaultTo
 - proposed resolution for CR30
 
Sunday, 20 August 2006
Wednesday, 16 August 2006
Tuesday, 15 August 2006
- Re: CR33: Describing RM using WSDL?
 - Re: CR33: Describing RM using WSDL?
 - Minutes, meeting of 2006-08-14
 - Re: Updated Table: wsaw:Anonymous Combinations
 - Re: CR33: Describing RM using WSDL?
 - Re: Updated Table: wsaw:Anonymous Combinations
 - Re: CR33: Describing RM using WSDL?
 
Monday, 14 August 2006
- Re: CR33: Describing RM using WSDL?
 - Re: Updated Table: wsaw:Anonymous Combinations
 - Re: Updated Table: wsaw:Anonymous Combinations
 - RE: Updated Table: wsaw:Anonymous Combinations
 - RE: CR33: Describing RM using WSDL?
 - RE: CR33: Describing RM using WSDL?
 - Re: CR33: Describing RM using WSDL?
 
Sunday, 13 August 2006
Saturday, 12 August 2006
- Agenda, 2006-08-14 distributed meeting
 - RE: Updated Table: wsaw:Anonymous Combinations
 - Minutes 2006-08-07 distributed meeting
 
Thursday, 10 August 2006
Wednesday, 9 August 2006
- Re: Updated Table: wsaw:Anonymous Combinations
 - Re: CR33
 - Re: CR33
 - Re: Comment on WSDL spec: use of Anonymous Element
 - Re: Updated Table: wsaw:Anonymous Combinations
 - Re: [ws-rx] Anon / RM MakeConnection: [reply ep] = none
 - Re: Anon / RM MakeConnection: response to Doug
 - Updated Table: wsaw:Anonymous Combinations
 - CR33
 - Re: [ws-rx] Re: Comment on WSDL spec: use of Anonymous Element
 - Re: [ws-rx] Re: Comment on WSDL spec: use of Anonymous Element
 - Re: Anon / RM MakeConnection: [reply ep] = none
 - Re: [ws-rx] Anon / RM MakeConnection: [reply ep] = none
 - Re: [ws-rx] Re: Comment on WSDL spec: use of Anonymous Element
 - Re: [wsi_wsbasic] Re: NEW ISSUE: wsa:Action header and SOAPAction HTTP header are of different types but required to be the same
 - Re: [ws-rx] Anon / RM MakeConnection: [reply ep] = none
 - Re: [ws-rx] Anon / RM MakeConnection: [reply ep] = none
 - Re: [ws-rx] Anon / RM MakeConnection: [reply ep] = none
 - Anon / RM MakeConnection: response to Doug
 - Anon / RM MakeConnection: [reply ep] = none
 - RE: [wsi_wsbasic] Re: NEW ISSUE: wsa:Action header and SOAPAction HTTP header are of different types but required to be the same
 - RE: [wsi_wsbasic] Re: NEW ISSUE: wsa:Action header and SOAPAction HTTP header are of different types but required to be the same
 - Re: [wsi_wsbasic] Re: NEW ISSUE: wsa:Action header and SOAPAction HTTP header are of different types but required to be the same
 
Tuesday, 8 August 2006
- Re: [ws-rx] Re: Comment on WSDL spec: use of Anonymous Element
 - Re: [ws-rx] Re: Comment on WSDL spec: use of Anonymous Element
 - Re: [ws-rx] Re: Comment on WSDL spec: use of Anonymous Element
 - Re: [wsi_wsbasic] Re: NEW ISSUE: wsa:Action header and SOAPAction HTTP header are of different types but required to be the same
 - RE: [wsi_wsbasic] Re: NEW ISSUE: wsa:Action header and SOAPAction HTTP header are of different types but required to be the same
 - Re: [wsi_wsbasic] NEW ISSUE: wsa:Action header and SOAPAction HTTP header are of different types but required to be the same
 - NEW ISSUE: wsa:Action header and SOAPAction HTTP header are of different types but required to be the same
 - Re: [ws-rx] Re: Comment on WSDL spec: use of Anonymous Element
 - Re: [ws-rx] Re: Comment on WSDL spec: use of Anonymous Element
 - Re: [ws-rx] Re: Comment on WSDL spec: use of Anonymous Element
 - Re: [ws-rx] Re: Comment on WSDL spec: use of Anonymous Element
 - Re: [ws-rx] Re: Comment on WSDL spec: use of Anonymous Element
 
Monday, 7 August 2006
- Re: [ws-rx] Re: Comment on WSDL spec: use of Anonymous Element
 - Re: Comment on WSDL spec: use of Anonymous Element
 
Sunday, 6 August 2006
Friday, 4 August 2006
- Agenda 2006-08-07 distributed meeting
 - Re: Comment on WSDL spec: use of Anonymous Element
 - Re: Comment on WSDL spec: use of Anonymous Element
 - Re: Comment on WSDL spec: use of Anonymous Element
 - Comment on WSDL spec: use of Anonymous Element
 
Thursday, 3 August 2006
- NEW ISSUE: None URI should be a special case and allowed when wsaw:anonymous=required
 - Minutes, meeting of 2006-07-31
 - RE: [NEW ISSUE]: Possible interop issue with WS-Addressing
 - Re: wsaw:Anonymous combinations
 - RE: wsaw:Anonymous combinations
 - FW: [ws-rx] [NEW ISSUE]: Possible interop issue with WS-Addressing
 - Re: Fw: wsaw:Anonymous combinations - another slight update
 - Re: wsaw:Anonymous combinations - another slight update
 - Re: wsaw:Anonymous combinations
 - Re: wsaw:Anonymous combinations
 - Fw: wsaw:Anonymous combinations - another slight update
 - Fw: wsaw:Anonymous combinations
 - Re: wsaw:Anonymous combinations