RE: Multiple Addresses in an EPR from Rich Salz on 2005-10-17 (public-ws-addressing@w3.org from October 2005)

From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:52:22 -0400 (EDT)
To: "Conor P. Cahill" <concahill@aol.com>
cc: WS-Addressing <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0510170751160.16065-100000@smtp.datapower.com>

I know it's very late in the cycle.

What *breaks* if this use-case is supported?  Semantically identical
servers dispersed geographically seems important, something worse
supporting in the base spec.

	/r$

-- 
Rich Salz                  Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology       http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway  http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html

Received on Monday, 17 October 2005 11:52:36 UTC