- From: David Hull <dmh@tibco.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 16:13:09 -0400
- To: Mark Nottingham <mark.nottingham@bea.com>
- Cc: "public-ws-addressing@w3.org" <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
- Message-id: <434D6E55.7050307@tibco.com>
Mark Nottingham wrote: > My recollection was that this was covered, at least tangentally, at > the F2F; to stretch your metaphor, someone wearing black might not be > a student at that institution, but if they wear something that's > black and has the crest of the university, they probably are. > Similarly, while the presence of the Action *property* doesn't mean > much, the header we define has a more restricted semantic; if you > don't want people to infer that you have addressing engaged, you can > still populate the property with another mechanism (e.g., a header > with a different QName). Sure, but I tend to think that argument holds for /any/ wsa: header. Put another way, I don't see how the non-defaulting-and-required-ness of [action] makes it any more significant as a signal that WSA was intended. > > Cheers, > > > On 11/10/2005, at 3:57 PM, David Hull wrote: > >> >> ... I think I finally put my finger on the other reason I don't like >> about keying "WSA is engaged" off of [action] instead of any wsa: >> header. >> >> As I understand it, the reasoning is that, since [action] is required >> and non-defaulting (and, as it happens, the only such), its presence >> indicates that the intent was to to engage WSA. But the implication is >> backwards. Intending to engage WSA implies wsa:Action (as it happens), >> but not vice versa. The students at the Aveda institute downstairs of >> our office are evidently required to wear all-black, but wearing >> all-black does not imply that one is studying cosmetology (one might >> instead be playing rugby for New Zealand, or one might just like >> black). >> >> Be that as it may, I accept that the issue is settled. >> >> >> > > > -- > Mark Nottingham Principal Technologist > Office of the CTO BEA Systems > > ________________________________________________________________________________ > > BEAWorld 2005: coming to a city near you. Everything you need for SOA > and enterprise infrastructure success. > > > Register now at http://www.bea.com/4beaworld > > > London 11-12 Oct| Paris13-14 Oct| Prague18-19 Oct |Tokyo 25-26 Oct| > Beijing 7-8 Dec >
Received on Wednesday, 12 October 2005 20:13:19 UTC