- From: David Hull <dmh@tibco.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 18:57:49 -0400
- To: "public-ws-addressing@w3.org" <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
... I think I finally put my finger on the other reason I don't like about keying "WSA is engaged" off of [action] instead of any wsa: header. As I understand it, the reasoning is that, since [action] is required and non-defaulting (and, as it happens, the only such), its presence indicates that the intent was to to engage WSA. But the implication is backwards. Intending to engage WSA implies wsa:Action (as it happens), but not vice versa. The students at the Aveda institute downstairs of our office are evidently required to wear all-black, but wearing all-black does not imply that one is studying cosmetology (one might instead be playing rugby for New Zealand, or one might just like black). Be that as it may, I accept that the issue is settled.
Received on Tuesday, 11 October 2005 22:57:58 UTC