- From: Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:02:13 -0800
- To: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
* Title - Information Model for EndpointReferences -- is it necessary? * Description - In the core spec, section 2.1 [1] describes the Information Model for EPRs. Section 2.2 maps these abstract properties to Infoset which are also abstract. The abstract Information Model is also linked to XML Schema due to the fact that the types of the abstract properties (in section 2.1) are specified in terms of XML Schema types. So how abstract is the Information model? Can we just specify things in terms of Infoset? The WG also resolved issue i032 [3] by saying that the XML Schema specified in WS-Addressing is normative and it is restricted to XML 1.0. Given these facts, what is it that section 2.1 buys us other than complexity? If there isn't any benefit (and I don't see any) then we should just remove section 2.1. * Justification - See above. * Target - Core * Proposal - Remove section 2.1 and make appropriate changes in the rest of the spec to ensure that we use correct terminology. -Anish -- [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-ws-addr-core-20050215/#_Toc77464318 [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-ws-addr-core-20050215/#_Toc77464319 [3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/wd-issues/#i032
Received on Monday, 28 February 2005 21:59:44 UTC