- From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:44:45 -0000
- Cc: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>, <www-tag@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <2B7789AAED12954AAD214AEAC13ACCEF2709E071@i2km02-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net>
slides for this morning's presentation: WS-Addressing Overview Joint W3C Meeting between WSAddressing WG and the TAG February 2005 *Motivation <Web Services Addressing provides transport-neutral mechanisms to address Web services and messages.> - `Email' for Web Services From Reply-To Correlation Cookies Other 'stuff' *Two Specifications - WS-MessageDelivery Oracle, Arjuna, Cyclone, Enigmatec, IONA, Nokia, seeBeyond and Sun - WS-Addressing BEA, IBM, Microsoft and Sun - Fundamental building block to many other specs *Deliverables - Core specification - Bindings for SOAP 1.1, 1.2 - Bindings for WSDL 1.1, 2.0 - Test suite - 4 Working implementations for CR *Timeline - aggressive schedule *Addressing Infoset <wsa:MessageID> xs:anyURI </wsa:MessageID> <wsa:RelatesTo RelationshipType="..."?> xs:anyURI</wsa:RelatesTo> <wsa:To>xs:anyURI</wsa:To> <wsa:Action>xs:anyURI</wsa:Action> <wsa:From>endpoint-reference</wsa:From> <wsa:ReplyTo>endpoint-reference</wsa:ReplyTo> <wsa:FaultTo>endpoint-reference</wsa:FaultTo> *Endpoint Reference (EPR) - From, ReplyTo, FaultTo: Address (IRI) Reference Properties Service Interface Service Endpoint Policies *Architectural Issues - Comparison of EPRs: <This specification provides no concept of endpoint identity and therefore does not provide any mechanism to determine equality or inequality of EPRs and does not specify the consequences of their equality or inequality. However, note that it is possible for other specifications to provide a comparison function that is applicable within a limited scope.> - Multiple Transports - Logical (v) Physical Address - Dependencies on other specifications
Attachments
- application/pdf attachment: ws-addr-tag-overview.pdf
Received on Monday, 28 February 2005 14:45:30 UTC