Re: endpoint definition

On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 04:01:05AM -0000, Jim Webber wrote:
> > Me, sneaky? 8-)
> Oh yeah. Sneaking in that "resource" word. That stuff's all happening
> over at OASIS mate :-)

I think the Web had dibs on the word long before WS-RF. 8-)

> > That would be a significant restriction over what's permitted by the
> > current definition, and would prevent a whole lot of Web-style
> > interactions.  -1
> Resource is potentially overloaded in this context (unfortunately).
> Obviously you know my MESTian viewpoint on this, and I your RESTafarian
> viewpoint - can we compromise on some other noun?

But it's not for me to decide!  The definition the WG come up with
already includes "resource".

Mark Baker.   Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.

Received on Thursday, 24 February 2005 04:19:11 UTC