- From: Marc Hadley <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM>
- Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 13:30:27 -0500
- To: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, public-ws-addressing@w3.org
Hmmm, so do we also need a 'default default' action for normal messages when there is no WSDL ? Seems like this would be the ultimate result of this train of logic. Marc. On Feb 4, 2005, at 2:43 PM, Jonathan Marsh wrote: > > All good, though it is strange to have something in the WSDL binding > spec that is specifically non-WSDL. Perhaps the predefined URI should > go in the core spec somewhere instead? > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Martin Gudgin >> Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 8:36 AM >> To: public-ws-addressing@w3.org >> Cc: Jonathan Marsh >> Subject: RE: New issue: We need a 'default default' action for faults >> >> Mark pointed out to me that we have a 'template' for raising issues. >> So here's the issue using that template which will hopefully be more >> complete and easier for people to get their heads around; >> >> Title: 'default default' action URI for fault messages. >> >> Description: The resolution for Issue 35[1] removed the fixed default >> action URI for fault messages and replaced it with a algorithm similar >> to that for non-fault messages. However, I believe we need a fixed URI >> for people to use when returning a fault that is NOT described in >> WSDL. If a fault isn't described in WSDL, then people used to be able >> to use the fixed URI. That option is no longer available to them. >> >> Justification: If we don't add a 'default default' then faults not >> described in WSDL will have to define a specific action, whereas they >> might wish to utilize a default fixed value. And they may have nowhere >> to define that specific action because the fault is NOT described in >> WSDL; they can't use explicit association (wsa:Action) because there >> is no where to hang the attribute. >> >> Target: wsdl >> >> Proposal: Add text along the following lines to section 3 >> >> 3.4 Default Action URI for faults NOT listed in WSDL >> >> In some systems not all faults can or will be listed in a WSDL >> description. >> Such faults still need an action URI. Faults not listed in a >> WSDL >> description MAY use the following >> action URI; http://www.w3.org/ws/2005/02/addressing/fault >> >> >> cheers >> >> Gudge >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/wd-issues/#i035 >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org >>> [mailto:public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of >>> Martin Gudgin >>> Sent: 01 February 2005 09:27 >>> To: public-ws-addressing@w3.org >>> Cc: Jonathan Marsh >>> Subject: New issue: We need a 'default default' action for faults >>> >>> >>> We've got rid of the fixed default action URI for fault messages and >>> replaced it with a algorithm similar to that for non-fault messages. >>> However, I believe we need a fixed URI for people to use when >>> returning >>> a fault that is NOT described in WSDL. If my fault isn't described >> in >>> WSDL, I used to be able to use the fixed URI and now I can't because >>> it's gone. >>> >>> Please can we put the fixed URI (or one like it) back, indicating >> that >>> it is intended ONLY for use with faults NOT listed in the WSDL. >>> >>> Note, I am NOT trying to re-open issue 35[1], I just think we missed >> a >>> case, that's all. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Gudge >>> >>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/wd-issues/#i035 >>> >>> > > --- Marc Hadley <marc.hadley at sun.com> Web Technologies and Standards, Sun Microsystems.
Received on Monday, 7 February 2005 18:30:31 UTC