- From: Mark Nottingham <mark.nottingham@bea.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 15:25:49 -0700
- To: W3C WS-Addressing Public List <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
This is now WD issue 61: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/wd-issues/#i061 On 11/08/2005, at 4:05 PM, Arun Gupta wrote: > > If the WSDL does not include wsaw:UsingAddressing in either > wsdl:binding > or wsdl:port but one or more wsdl:portType/wsdl:operation contain > wsaw:Action, the expected behavior in such a case is unclear. Here are > the six possible options: > > 1. Inclusion of wsa:Action without inclusion of wsa:UsingAddressing is > equivalent to inclusion of wsa:UsingAddressing with > wsdl:required=true. > IOW, messages MUST include wsa MAPs and wsa:Action MUST be honored. > > 2. Inclusion of wsa:Action without inclusion of wsa:UsingAddressing is > equivalent to inclusion of wsa:UsingAddressing with > wsdl:required=false. > IOW, messages MAY include wsa MAPs but if so wsa:Action MUST be > honored. > > 3. Inclusion of wsa:Action without inclusion of wsa:UsingAddressing is > purely advisory. IOW, messages MAY include wsa MAPs and if so > wsa:Action > MAY be honored. > > 4. Inclusion of wsa:Action without inclusion of wsa:UsingAddressing is > purely advisory. IOW, the messages MAY include wsa MAPs and if so > wsa:Action MUST be honored. > > 5. Inclusion of wsa:Action without inclusion of wsa:UsingAddressing is > equivalent gets ignored. IOW, messages MUST not include wsa MAPs. > > 6. Something else > > In 3 and 4, other information is needed to determine whether > WS-Addressing is supported. > > The spec needs to provide a clear guidance on what needs to happen in > such a case. 2 or 3 seems ok and I have a preference for 2. > > -Arun > > -- > got Web Services ? > Download Java Web Services Developer Pack from > http://java.sun.com/webservices > > > -- Mark Nottingham Principal Technologist Office of the CTO BEA Systems
Received on Wednesday, 24 August 2005 22:26:02 UTC