- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 14:13:07 -0400
- To: Marc Hadley <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM>
- Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
Marc, On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 10:31:40AM -0400, Marc Hadley wrote: > >Yes, I understand that to be your (and others) positions. I believe > >that position is inconsistent with the HTTP specification, and > >possibly inconsistent with the SOAP specification (per the ambiguity > >over what ImmediateDestination means). > > > Its not so much that its my position, its just what the spec says > right now. I know you've pointed out an ambiguity in one part of the > spec but I quoted several other parts where that ambiguity is not > present and reflects the interpretation I describe above. I checked back through your messages in this thread but the only one that I found that quotes any part of the spec is; http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing/2005Aug/0057.html I believe my position is entirely consistent with what you quoted. > IMO, the SOAP 1.2 HTTP binding clearly treats intermediaries as HTTP > gateways, I agree that there's ambiguity in the text you point to but > your desired interpretation is not borne out by the rest of the > specification. Which parts? Mark. -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca Coactus; Web-inspired integration strategies http://www.coactus.com
Received on Wednesday, 24 August 2005 18:11:32 UTC