- From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 17:21:03 +0100
- To: <katy_warr@uk.ibm.com>, <mark.nottingham@bea.com>
- Cc: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Hi Katy! > 1. Is this likely to be going to be f2f testing or will > participants simply publish remote endpoints? I would certainly advocate putting up stable endpoints which may be accessed outside of a 'fest', especially given the higher level of configuration often required for async testing. However this could be too high a bar for participants wanting to run software on their laptops during the workshop. > 2. If the procedure is likely to be that the participants > publish remote endpoints (without need for meeting), what > sort of timescale is usually expected for this testing phase? > For example, would participants have a few weeks to run tests > and resolve problems or would the interop be more intense > - such as a week focussed on problem resolution and testing? I think that would be for us as a working group to decide. I'd imagine we'd solicit, agree upon and then specify a set of test scenarios which could be then implemented by those wanting to participate. We also have to decide which of the tests to use for our exit criteria from CR. Paul
Received on Monday, 8 August 2005 16:21:14 UTC