public-ws-addressing@w3.org from April 2005 by date

Friday, 29 April 2005

• RE: [lc35] Duplicate headers at the ultimate receiver (SOAP, substantive) Rogers, Tony
• RE: [lc34] Duplicate headers at the ultimate receiver (SOAP, substantive) Jonathan Marsh
• [lc35] Duplicate headers at the ultimate receiver (SOAP, substantive) Jonathan Marsh
• [lc26] Clarify which fault if SOAP Action and wsa:Action don't match (SOAP, substantive) Jonathan Marsh
• [lc6][lc35]: Clarify conformance requirements (SOAP, substantive) Jonathan Marsh

Thursday, 28 April 2005

• Overriding WSDL 2.0 fault ruleset behavior Jonathan Marsh
• WSDL "service references" and WSA endpoint references Jonathan Marsh

Tuesday, 26 April 2005

• RE: Language for Reference Parameters Savas Parastatidis
• Re: Language for Reference Parameters Francisco Curbera
• Language for Reference Parameters Savas Parastatidis

Saturday, 23 April 2005

• Minutes of the 2004-04-[19,20] F2F Mark Nottingham

Friday, 22 April 2005

• i056 Proposal Marc Hadley
• NEW ISSUE: Semantics of wsa:UsingAddressing@wsdl:Required="false" case are unclear. David Hull
• Closed LC Issues from F2F Marc Hadley
• Possibly substantive LC issues David Hull

Thursday, 21 April 2005

• Fw: proposal to add an {action} property to message and fault reference components Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: i058 resolution text Anish Karmarkar

Wednesday, 20 April 2005

• Missing xml namespace prefix declaration (WSDL, editorial) Winkler, Steve
• i058 resolution text Jonathan Marsh
• i021 resolution Mark Nottingham

Tuesday, 19 April 2005

• LC9 - Reinforce absolute IRIs Greg Truty
• LC10 - EIIs have QNames Rogers, Tony
• Action item for issue i021 Francisco Curbera

Monday, 18 April 2005

• i055: Sample RDDL document Jonathan Marsh

Friday, 15 April 2005

• Last Call issues list Mark Nottingham
• Re: NEW ISSUE: Defining MAPs in WSDL service descriptions Prasad Yendluri
• NEW ISSUE: Splitting semantics of namespace across multiple WS-A specs inhibits independent versioning Prasad Yendluri
• NEW ISSUE: Defining MAPs in WSDL service descriptions Prasad Yendluri
• Agenda: 2005-04-19 F2F, Sunnyvale, CA, US Mark Nottingham
• Re: NEW ISSUE: Support for asynchronous / multi-MEP usage of web services Mark Nottingham

Thursday, 14 April 2005

• NEW ISSUE: Support for asynchronous / multi-MEP usage of web services Glen Daniels

Wednesday, 13 April 2005

• NEW ISSUE: Defining MAPs in WSDL service descriptions [i058] Mark Nottingham
• Re: NEW ISSUE: How to determine the value of the [reference parameters] property from WSDL? [i057] Mark Nottingham
• Re: NEW ISSUE: How to determine the value of the [destination] property from WSDL? [i056] Mark Nottingham
• Re: NEW ISSUE: use RDDL instead of XML Schema at the namespace URI? [i055] Mark Nottingham

Tuesday, 12 April 2005

• Re: Editorial stuff for Core Spec Mark Nottingham
• Editorial stuff for Core Spec Srinivas, Davanum M
• Re: Typo? Marc Hadley

Monday, 11 April 2005

• Minutes of the 2005-04-11 teleconference Mark Nottingham
• RE: Typo? Srinivas, Davanum M
• Re: Syncing XSD and Spec Marc Hadley
• Re: Typo? Marc Hadley
• RE: Typo? Srinivas, Davanum M
• Syncing XSD and Spec Srinivas, Davanum M
• RE: NEW ISSUE: use RDDL instead of XML Schema at the namespace URI? Jonathan Marsh
• Re: NEW ISSUE: use RDDL instead of XML Schema at the namespace URI? Anish Karmarkar
• Typo? Srinivas, Davanum M
• Re: Action item for issue i021 Prasad Yendluri
• RE: Action item for issue i021 Jonathan Marsh
• RE: NEW ISSUE: use RDDL instead of XML Schema at the namespace URI? Jonathan Marsh
• Re: NEW ISSUE: use RDDL instead of XML Schema at the namespace URI? Anish Karmarkar
• RE: Agenda: WS-A telcon 2005-04-11 paul.downey@bt.com
• NEW ISSUE: How to determine the value of the [reference parameters] property from WSDL? Anish Karmarkar
• NEW ISSUE: How to determine the value of the [destination] property from WSDL? Anish Karmarkar
• Re: Agenda: WS-A telcon 2005-04-11 Mark Nottingham
• Agenda: WS-A telcon 2005-04-11 Mark Nottingham

Friday, 8 April 2005

• Re: NEW ISSUE: use RDDL instead of XML Schema at the namespace URI? Prasad Yendluri
• RE: NEW ISSUE: use RDDL instead of XML Schema at the namespace URI? paul.downey@bt.com

Thursday, 7 April 2005

• NEW ISSUE: use RDDL instead of XML Schema at the namespace URI? Jonathan Marsh

Wednesday, 6 April 2005

• Re: Test Case Form Try-out Hugo Haas

Tuesday, 5 April 2005

• Agenda: 2005-04-19 F2F, Sunnyvale, CA, US [DRAFT] Mark Nottingham
• Minutes of the 2005-04-04 teleconference Mark Nottingham
• Re: New Issue (editorial): problem with namespace documents Hugo Haas

Monday, 4 April 2005

• New Issue (editorial): problem with namespace documents Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Action item for issue i021 Prasad Yendluri
• Re: Action item for issue i021 Hugo Haas
• Re: Action item for issue i021 Prasad Yendluri
• Re: Action item for issue i021 Prasad Yendluri
• RE: Action item for issue i021 Glen Daniels
• Re: Action item for issue i021 Hugo Haas
• Re: Action item for issue i021 Anish Karmarkar
• Re: Issue i020, subissue 3 proposal Anish Karmarkar

Saturday, 2 April 2005

• Agenda: WS-A telcon 2005-04-04 [NOTE CHANGED TIMES] Mark Nottingham

Friday, 1 April 2005

• Satisfying WSDL-related charter requirements Mark Nottingham

Last message date: Friday, 29 April 2005 21:55:15 UTC