- From: Glen Daniels <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 11:03:49 -0500
- To: <paul.downey@bt.com>
- Cc: <public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org>
I'm not exactly sure why this should be any different than, for instance, tests 1140 and 1143... 1140 tests a required feature, and 1143 tests the same required feature but for a different case. They're both important and both marked REQUIRED. Just because the assertions are already "covered" by different tests doesn't mean that this test isn't checking a piece of required behavior, and in fact one which most implementations are currently doing incorrectly. Personally, I'd leave it REQUIRED, since it's not testing an optional feature and it covers a case the other tests don't. *shrug* --G > -----Original Message----- > From: paul.downey@bt.com [mailto:paul.downey@bt.com] > Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 7:53 AM > To: Glen Daniels > Cc: public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org > Subject: test1149 and test1249 [was RE: New test] > > I've added two new test cases, and marked them > as INFORMATIONAL for now as they exhibit > REQUIRED features, we already have coverage of > the 'features' elsewhere, so I don't think they're > stricktly REQUIRED for CR. > > We can upgrade them if we go through another > round of CR testing for Core, SOAP or even WSDL > - make sense? > > Paul > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Glen Daniels [mailto:gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com] > Sent: Fri 3/17/2006 11:31 PM > To: Downey,P,Paul,CXMA C > Cc: public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org > Subject: RE: New test > > > D'oh, I knew I'd forget something! > > The new message (duplicateToReplyToNone.xml?) should look just like > duplicateToRequest.xml, but with a ReplyTo of none: > > <?xml version="1.0"?> > <soap11:Envelope > xmlns:soap11="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" > xmlns:wsa="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"> > <soap11:Header> > <wsa:Action>http://example.org/action/echoIn</wsa:Action> > > <wsa:MessageID>urn:uuid:BCF59302-0E0B-4EF8-B581-6F2DAFF007AF</ > wsa:Messag > eID> > <wsa:To>http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/anonymous</wsa:To> > <wsa:To>http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/anonymous</wsa:To> > <wsa:ReplyTo> > > <wsa:Address>http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/none</wsa:Address> > </wsa:ReplyTo> > </soap11:Header> > <soap11:Body> > <m:echoIn xmlns:m="http://example.org/echo">Echo This > Text</m:echoIn> > </soap11:Body> > </soap11:Envelope> > > --Glen > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: paul.downey@bt.com [mailto:paul.downey@bt.com] > > Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 1:29 PM > > To: Glen Daniels; public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org > > Subject: RE: New test > > > > I'm looking into adding this new test when I noticed test1140 > > and test1146 already send the duplicateToRequest.xml message. > > > > So how are these tests different to your new one - I'd expect > > the example messages to be different!? > > > > Paul > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org on behalf of > > Glen Daniels > > Sent: Thu 3/16/2006 11:55 PM > > To: public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org > > Subject: New test > > > > > > > > Here's the test I was suggesting, in what I hope is the > right format. > > > > Should we do both a SOAP 1.1 and a SOAP 1.2 version of this? > > > > --G > > > > <testcase xml:id="test1149" > > cr="REQUIRED"> > > <title>SOAP 1.1 two-way message with a duplicate To > > header and a ReplyTo of none.</title> > > <description><![CDATA[Two-way message exchange containing > > a duplicate To header and ReplyTo of none. An > > InvalidAddressingHeader fault should be generated, but not > > sent due to the ReplyTo header.]]></description> > > <features> > > <feature>soap08</feature> > > <feature>core10</feature> > > </features> > > <message-exchange type="SOAP11-HTTP-In-Out-Fault" > > addr-binding="soap11"> > > <message from="A" to="B" > > document="echo/soap11/duplicateToRequest.xml" name="message"> > > <assert > > test="count(soap11:Envelope/soap11:Header/wsa:To) = 2"/> > > <assert > > test="soap11:Envelope/soap11:Header/wsa:ReplyTo/wsa:Address = > > 'http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/none'"> > > <assert > > test="count(soap11:Envelope/soap11:Header/wsa:FaultTo) > > = 0"/> > > </message> > > <message from="B" to="A"/> > > </message-exchange> > > </testcase> > > > > > > > >
Received on Monday, 20 March 2006 16:04:01 UTC