- From: Glen Daniels <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 14:24:29 -0500
- To: "Mike Vernal" <Mike.Vernal@microsoft.com>
- Cc: <public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org>
Hey folks: Some interesting results from the latest MS test run against Axis (thanks, folks): 1143 and 1243 are failing because MS is sending a non-URI value for the duplicate Action header, and Axis is catching that as a problem before it notices the invalid addressing header fault. Since this is essentially a schema validation error, I think we're OK in our behavior (what do others think?) - that box will turn green if MS can change the "duplicate-action" value to something like "http://duplicate-action". It looks like 1142/1242 are failing because we're trying to send the fault to http://duplicate/ (the value of the second FaultTo). What's the right behavior here? Should we always default to anonymous for duplicate FaultTo/ReplyTo errors? It certainly doesn't say that in the spec anywhere.... is this something we need to clear up in the spec? I have no idea what's up with 1150/1250/1251 - Mike, if you (or whoever's appropriate) get some time I'd love to debug this in realtime at some point... 1170 is failing because we are (correctly) catching the fact that "true" isn't a valid MU attribute value for SOAP 1.1. The <wsa:From> header should be using "1" if MS wants to mark it MU. So if MS fixes the three client issues, that'll clear 1143/1243/1170, I'm looking for guidance on 1142/1242, and hopefully we can fix 1150/1250/1251. Thanks, --Glen
Received on Wednesday, 8 March 2006 19:26:02 UTC