- From: Davanum Srinivas <dims@wso2.com>
- Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2006 07:02:33 -0500
- To: paul.downey@bt.com
- CC: jmarsh@microsoft.com, public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Excuse me paul...FYI, IBM's and Microsoft's public clients had bugs that we helped clear up. IMHO, looking at things from another angle is an asset. For example: - - MSFT's ReplyTo port was closed (firewall) - - IBM added an custom ReplyTo field to so that we can capture the ReplyTo messages - - MSFT's requests were not following the pattern "faulttestxxxx" in the body etc... Also remember you told me that we should start on the server side and that you are working on a pre-canned client and we should better start with the server-side first? So have patience my friend :) thanks, dims paul.downey@bt.com wrote: > I'm mostly ok with this - it's just a shame that > Microsoft, IBM and Sun provide a log of their interactions > with Microsoft, IBM and Sun .. > > WSO2, otoh are only showing IBM and Microsoft clients sending > to themselves, and not their client talking to the rest, geddit? > > Paul > > -----Original Message----- > From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:dims@wso2.com] > Sent: Sat 3/4/2006 6:22 PM > To: Downey,P,Paul,CXMA C > Cc: jmarsh@microsoft.com; public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org > Subject: Re: Saturday Morning, 4th March > > Yes please. > > paul.downey@bt.com wrote: >>> hi dims >>> >>>> Please add the 2 logs (ibm-wso2.xml and msft-wso2.xml) from [1]. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> dims >>>> >>>> [1] http://www-lk.wso2.com/~dims/wsalogs/ >>> er i already see msft to wso2 on the Microsoft site and IBM to wso2 >>> on the IBM site, but the messages coming back from wso2 aren't valid XML. >>> >>> So are you asking me to ignore their logs and now take these instead? >>> >>> Paul > > > -- > Davanum Srinivas (dims@wso2.com) > VP/Engg, WSO2 (http://wso2.com) > Yahoo IM: dims Cell/Mobile: +1 (508) 415 7509 - -- Davanum Srinivas (dims@wso2.com) VP/Engg, WSO2 (http://wso2.com) Yahoo IM: dims Cell/Mobile: +1 (508) 415 7509 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Cygwin) iD8DBQFECtNZgNg6eWEDv1kRAl/lAKDtm7nbif9WwcxfhoJxA+qwHFAf5wCgxB1e W2yc7k4+KNd+aaicj1OhQnU= =WAfg -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Sunday, 5 March 2006 12:05:25 UTC