- From: David Illsley <david.illsley@uk.ibm.com>
- Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 17:27:37 +0000
- To: <public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OFB677911C.BA4D38D9-ON80257127.005E98E9-80257127.005FE351@uk.ibm.com>
Hi all, I've been reviewing a problem with the IBM client which has problems with one of the implementations which doesn't send a RelatesTo on a non-anonymous response. (I've followed up on this off-list) It's important that this header be there (pretty fundamental in an async model) and isn't currently caught by an assertion so I propose adding the relevant assertions from 1130 and 1230 to 1150 and 1250 to make sure that the RelatesTo is there e.g. <assert test="soap11:Envelope/soap11:Header/wsa:RelatesTo = ../preceding-sibling::log:message[@testcase=current()/../@testcase and @message='1']/log:content/soap11:Envelope/soap11:Header/wsa:MessageID"/> <assert test= "not(soap11:Envelope/soap11:Header/wsa:RelatesTo/@RelationshipType) or soap11:Envelope/soap11:Header/wsa:RelatesTo/@RelationshipType = 'http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/reply'"/> This is in my opinion important enough to add even at this late stage in the game. Thoughts? David David Illsley Web Services Development MP127, IBM Hursley Park, SO21 2JN +44 (0)1962 815049 (Int. 245049) david.illsley@uk.ibm.com
Received on Saturday, 4 March 2006 17:27:28 UTC