Re: Saturday Morning, 4th March

No JBoss-to-IBM, JBoss-to-JBoss, JBoss-to-MSFT or JBoss-to-WSO2 either :-(

Mark.


Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Paul,
>
> IBM->WSO2 is missing from the matrix? I'll send an update today for the bad stuff. Yes, i will send a url :)
>
> thanks,
> dims
>
> Mark Little wrote:
>   
>> Hi Paul. Comments inline.
>>
>> paul.downey@bt.com wrote:
>>     
>>> Arun, All,
>>>
>>> I've been periodically slurping the logs down from people's servers,
>>> in as friendly US timezone as my need to sleep allowed :)
>>>
>>> It takes special manual effort to processs logs sent by Email, and
>>> we've seen a bunch of these sent this week during the F2F.
>>> It's therefore possible regression may have been introduced on both
>>> the actor and observer sides of the shop :)
>>>
>>> - I can't access the JBoss server (I get a timeout), and looking
>>> at the attachments see we have to assemble them into the single
>>> log file the report expects for each interaction?
>>>   
>>>       
>> Apologies, as we thought we were adhering to the required log format.
>> Can you point me in the right direction and we'll change asap?
>>     
>>> Still no log server from WSO2, that would be very helpful.
>>>
>>> So really it's not been ideal for us to work on this, this week,
>>> but maybe we can all pull it together during next week.
>>>
>>> *IMPORTANT NOTICE*
>>> As the matrix is now getting large, and time is running out, Jonathan
>>> and I have decided we can no longer accommodate ad-hoc log files sent
>>> in ad-hoc ways and formats - you need to provide a log directory on a
>>> web site with one log file per interaction to all the other parties
>>> in either WS-I or our own format to make it onto the report.   
>>>       
>> Shouldn't be a problem if you can provide the reference.
>>     
>>> *IMPORTANT NOTICE*
>>>
>>>  
>>>       
>>>> And also the WS-I monitor changes the wsa:To header which the
>>>> Microsoft stack does not seem to like. I'll try to make these changes
>>>> over the weekend and send updated logs.
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> bizare!
>>>
>>>  
>>>       
>>>> test1152 and 1252 still needs to be fixed in the CVS repository. They
>>>> are still checking for 4 messages whereas they should only be 2.
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> we've been working on that - David had a fix which we've added:
>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing-tests/2006Mar/0029.html
>>>
>>>
>>>  
>>>       
>>>> I cant meet tuesday morning since I'll be travelling tuesday through
>>>> thursday. I can do monday or friday morning instead.
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> Monday and friday evenings aren't great for me, but I've
>>> been working with Jonathan so as not to become "the weakest link"
>>> and so together we can cover 2/3rs of the timezones :)
>>>
>>>  
>>>       
>>>> Can you please regenerate the report by picking up the logs for
>>>> Sun->Sun, Sun->IBM, Sun->Axis, Sun->JBoss from [1] ? This will give a
>>>> better idea of the current status.
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> have been doing so, Arun, maybe you'd like to add WSO2 to your matrix,
>>> and refresh the Microsoft log, it's as old as the hills:
>>>  
>>>    Sun-Microsoft.xml     86.9 kb     Thu, 19 Jan 2006 03:25:08 GMT
>>>
>>> [1] http://soapinterop.java.sun.com:8080/wsalogs/.
>>>
>>> Can everyone please try to add logs for all other endpoints:
>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/testsuite/endpoints/
>>>
>>> State of play after our hack this morning:
>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/testsuite/report/
>>>
>>> still getting problems with lots of white boxes in the Sun columns,
>>> can't reach the JBoss log file server
>>>       
>> That should be up soon.
>>     
>>>  and I'm still getting bad prefix 'echo' from some of the WSO2 log
>>> files  which
>>> breaks the processor and now makes their column all 'bad'.
>>>   
>>>       
>> Mark.
>>     
>>> Paul
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>>     
>
>
> - --
> Davanum Srinivas (dims@wso2.com)
> VP/Engg, WSO2 (http://wso2.com)
> Yahoo IM: dims Cell/Mobile: +1 (508) 415 7509
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Cygwin)
>
> iD8DBQFECXzQgNg6eWEDv1kRAu83AKCdCu/sgztyFURb6G+7Y4psvdwEEACeMGA8
> XQbR9R7/ojOv+zq+0PVtpA8=
> =kuS5
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>

Received on Saturday, 4 March 2006 12:36:28 UTC