- From: Arun Gupta <Arun.Gupta@Sun.COM>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 08:57:31 -0700
- To: David Illsley <david.illsley@uk.ibm.com>
- Cc: public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org
Hi David, I think from WSDL Binding perspective, there are two types of addresses: anonymous and non-anonymous. With that I'd qualify none URI as non-anonymous. What additional feature of WSDL Binding do you think this might test otherwise ? -Arun David Illsley wrote: > I think it would be good to have a tests for anonymous=required with > request messages with ReplyTo/FaultTo=none uri. > I'm not 100% what the correct behavior would be so feels like a good > interop test. Thoughts? > David > > David Illsley > Web Services Development > MP127, IBM Hursley Park, SO21 2JN > +44 (0)1962 815049 (Int. 245049) > david.illsley@uk.ibm.com -- got Web Services ? Download and Contribute Web Services Interoperability Technology (WSIT) http://java.sun.com/webservices/interop
Received on Monday, 31 July 2006 15:57:38 UTC