RE: Administrivia from Glen Daniels on 2006-01-12 (public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org from January 2006)

From: Glen Daniels <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:25:59 -0500
To: "Hugo Haas" <hugo@w3.org>
Cc: <public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org>
Message-ID: <80A43FC052CE3949A327527DCD5D6B2701802CA2@MAIL01.bedford.progress.com>

Hi Hugo: 

> I'm afraid that Reply-To for mailing lists has more drawbacks than
> advantages, as outlined in this famous document:
> 
>     "Reply-To" Munging Considered Harmful
>     http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html

I hadn't read that before, and while it's certainly heartfelt, I find
quite a few of the arguments that it makes to be shortsighted if not
objectionable.  But that's another story. :)

> So I'd rather stick with the current solution, to which W3C
> participants are used.

No problemo.

--Glen

Received on Thursday, 12 January 2006 18:26:11 UTC