- From: Davanum Srinivas <dims@wso2.com>
- Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 16:20:25 -0500
- To: public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Team, Encouraged a bit by Glen's enthusiasm...Sorry if the group has already talked about these, Google did not help me much to find relevent discussions, would appreciate a link. While reviewing the coverage for SOAP1.1, noticed that the following tests did not have equivalents for SOAP1.1: test1236 SOAP 1.2 two-way message with a ReplyTo address of none. test1237 SOAP 1.2 two-way message with a ReplyTo address of none and a role of '/next'. test1238 SOAP 1.2 two-way message triggers mustUnderstand fault test1247 SOAP 1.2 two-way message with a duplicate To header. test1251 SOAP 1.2 two-way message with a non-anonymous ReplyTo address and a Reply targeted to none. test1260 SOAP 1.2 two-way message with an unreachable ReplyTo address. Notes: - - test1236 - any clue why we can't have an soap11 equivalent? - - test1237 - has a soap1.2 specific thing namely the "role" which is not in SOAP1.1. So let's count that out. - - test1238 - i do see a soap fault code for MustUnderstand in soap11 (http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/NOTE-SOAP-20000508/#_Toc478383510). Is there a reason we don't have a test for soap11? - - test1247 - Is there no place we can stick in the InvalidCardinality on the way back? - - test1251 - no clue why we can't have an soap11 equivalent - - test1260 - no equivalent in soap11 where we can stick in wsa:ProblemIRI? thanks, dims - -- Davanum Srinivas (dims@wso2.com) VP/Engg, WSO2 (http://wso2.com) Yahoo IM: dims Cell/Mobile: +1 (508) 415 7509 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Cygwin) iD8DBQFD6mCYDQylxigoT5kRAn8TAJ9b7jUedtRXNqbO1Tc31DmCvCgmmwCaAzpL ffTmOMvhfOnrqdXv/EzmwAI= =8pwx -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 8 February 2006 21:22:32 UTC