- From: Mike Vernal <Mike.Vernal@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 10:38:26 -0800
- To: <paul.downey@bt.com>, <public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org>
In case anyone was worried, the klaxons in the background ended up being a false alarm. ;) Sorry for the interruption, -mike -----Original Message----- From: public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-addressing-tests-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of paul.downey@bt.com Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 10:36 AM To: public-ws-addressing-tests@w3.org Subject: note from WS-Addressing Test Suite TF call 2 Nov 2005 Present: Mark Nottingham, Paul Downey, David Hull, Mike Vernal, David Illsley discussion in general around the test suite status and requirements for CR .. test cases for addressing soap CR and timing of interop event .. timing of interop event and WSDL CR testing .. do we merge the WSDL CR testing with an interop event, hold one separately later, or not have one at all? .. we should concentrate on CR exit for core and soap, WSDL will come later pauld: still lacking in some test cases, sending WSDL and other meta-data, for example dhull: lack of specifications for some of our scenarios which go beyond request/response mnot: wants to walk through tests at the F2F and validate them and their methodology dhull: we need to walk through the features pauld: wants to better understand i059 when it comes to writing WSDL for the test cases mnot: rules for formulating a reply message changed in the editors' draft, will impact features list
Received on Wednesday, 2 November 2005 18:39:53 UTC