- From: Marc Hadley via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 16:52:16 +0000
- To: public-ws-addressing-eds@w3.org
Update of /sources/public/2004/ws/addressing
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv10740
Modified Files:
ws-addr-soap.xml
Log Message:
Added CR18 resolution. Also fixed some terminology 'response endpoint' to '[reply endpoint] property, changed explicit URIs to use predefined entity and fixed use of invalid markup '<a>' to '<xspecref>'
Index: ws-addr-soap.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/2004/ws/addressing/ws-addr-soap.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.110
retrieving revision 1.111
diff -C2 -d -r1.110 -r1.111
*** ws-addr-soap.xml 18 Feb 2006 23:38:39 -0000 1.110
--- ws-addr-soap.xml 1 Mar 2006 16:52:14 -0000 1.111
***************
*** 437,449 ****
<div2 id="anonaddress">
<head>Use of Anonymous Address in SOAP</head>
<div3>
<head>SOAP 1.1/HTTP</head>
! <p>When "http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/addressing/anonymous" is specified for the response
! endpoint then there is no change to the SOAP 1.1/ HTTP binding. </p>
</div3>
<div3>
<head>SOAP 1.2</head>
! <p>When "http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/addressing/anonymous" is specified for the response
! endpoint and the request is the request part of a SOAP request-response MEP [<bibref
ref="SOAP12-PART2"/>], then any response MUST be the response part of the same SOAP
request-response MEP [<bibref ref="SOAP12-PART2"/>].</p>
--- 437,451 ----
<div2 id="anonaddress">
<head>Use of Anonymous Address in SOAP</head>
+ <p>A value of "&nsuri;/anonymous" for
+ the [destination] property implies no particular semantics.</p>
<div3>
<head>SOAP 1.1/HTTP</head>
! <p>When "&nsuri;/anonymous" is specified for the [reply
! endpoint] property then there is no change to the SOAP 1.1/ HTTP binding. </p>
</div3>
<div3>
<head>SOAP 1.2</head>
! <p>When "&nsuri;/anonymous" is specified for the [reply
! endpoint] property and the message is the request part of a SOAP request-response MEP [<bibref
ref="SOAP12-PART2"/>], then any response MUST be the response part of the same SOAP
request-response MEP [<bibref ref="SOAP12-PART2"/>].</p>
***************
*** 454,472 ****
<div3>
<head>SOAP 1.1/HTTP</head>
! <p>When "http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/addressing/anonymous" is not specified for the response
! endpoint, then the request SHOULD be part of a binding (such as <ednote>
! <edtext>reference to the one-way/request-optional-response SOAP 1.1/HTTP MEP note as
! per <a
! href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing/2006Feb/0107.html"
! >David Orchard's draft.</a></edtext>
! </ednote> ) that supports not returning a SOAP envelope in the HTTP response. Any
response message SHOULD be sent using a separate connection and using the address value
specified by response endpoint. Note that other specifications MAY define special URIs
that have other behaviours (similar to the anonymous URI).</p>
</div3>
<div3>
<head>SOAP 1.2</head>
! <p>When "http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/addressing/anonymous" is not specified for the response
! endpoint, then any response SHOULD not be the response part of the same SOAP
request-response MEP [<bibref ref="SOAP12-PART2"/>]. For instance, a SOAP 1.2 HTTP
binding that supports a one-way MEP could put the reply message in a separate one-way
--- 456,474 ----
<div3>
<head>SOAP 1.1/HTTP</head>
! <p>When "&nsuri;/anonymous" is not specified for the [reply
! endpoint] property, then the message SHOULD be part of a binding that supports not returning a SOAP envelope in the HTTP response. Any
response message SHOULD be sent using a separate connection and using the address value
specified by response endpoint. Note that other specifications MAY define special URIs
that have other behaviours (similar to the anonymous URI).</p>
+ <ednote>
+ <edtext>See, e.g., the one-way/request-optional-response SOAP 1.1/HTTP MEP note as
+ per <xspecref href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing/2006Feb/0107.html">David Orchard's draft.</xspecref>
+ </edtext>
+ </ednote>
</div3>
<div3>
<head>SOAP 1.2</head>
! <p>When "&nsuri;/anonymous" is not specified for the [reply
! endpoint] property, then any response SHOULD not be the response part of the same SOAP
request-response MEP [<bibref ref="SOAP12-PART2"/>]. For instance, a SOAP 1.2 HTTP
binding that supports a one-way MEP could put the reply message in a separate one-way
Received on Wednesday, 1 March 2006 16:52:30 UTC