- From: Glen Daniels <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 18:55:33 -0400
- To: <public-ws-addressing-comments@w3.org>
Addressers: As discussed yesterday at the F2F, I would like to raise the following CR issue. Last Call issue number 89, comment 7 [1], brought up the issue that we did (and do) not specify how to formulate anything other than a "reply" message in our spec. Especially in light of the fact that we have been discussing how to map EPRs to WSDL, there are clearly cases where one wants to know how to formulate and send a message to an EPR outside of the context of an explicit reply. In order to specify this, we could make the following changes: * Factor out most of the content of step 2 (all but the second bullet) in the current section 3.2 into a new section 3.2, called "Sending a Message to an EPR" or the like. The remaining stuff would be section 3.3, "Formulating a Reply Message". * The text of step 2 in the new section 3.3 would change to "send the message per 'sending a message to an EPR' above, and additionally populate the [relationship] property as follows: a new pair of IRIs... <rest of old text>" It seems that this would be a very simple change to make, and would clarify our specification for any number of non-reply-specific use cases. Thanks, --Glen [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/lc-issues/#lc89
Received on Thursday, 29 September 2005 22:55:57 UTC