- From: David Hull <dmh@tibco.com>
- Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 11:18:08 -0400
- To: Glen Daniels <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com>
- Cc: public-ws-addressing-comments@w3.org
A belated +1. Glen Daniels wrote: > >Addressers: > >As discussed yesterday at the F2F, I would like to raise the following >CR issue. > >Last Call issue number 89, comment 7 [1], brought up the issue that we >did (and do) not specify how to formulate anything other than a "reply" >message in our spec. Especially in light of the fact that we have been >discussing how to map EPRs to WSDL, there are clearly cases where one >wants to know how to formulate and send a message to an EPR outside of >the context of an explicit reply. In order to specify this, we could >make the following changes: > >* Factor out most of the content of step 2 (all but the second bullet) >in the current section 3.2 into a new section 3.2, called "Sending a >Message to an EPR" or the like. The remaining stuff would be section >3.3, "Formulating a Reply Message". > >* The text of step 2 in the new section 3.3 would change to "send the >message per 'sending a message to an EPR' above, and additionally >populate the [relationship] property as follows: a new pair of IRIs... ><rest of old text>" > >It seems that this would be a very simple change to make, and would >clarify our specification for any number of non-reply-specific use >cases. > >Thanks, >--Glen > >[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/lc-issues/#lc89 > > > >
Received on Friday, 7 October 2005 15:32:29 UTC