- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:07:37 -0700
- To: "Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com>, <public-ws-addressing-comments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <7DA77BF2392448449D094BCEF67569A507DCE488@RED-MSG-30.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Thank you for your comment, tracked as LC106 [1]. The WG agreed to conform to the pseudo-schema notation defined in WSDL 2.0, which notation has been fixed to illustrate element simpleType content. [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/lc-issues/#lc106 ________________________________ From: public-ws-addressing-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-addressing-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Yalcinalp, Umit Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 12:04 PM To: public-ws-addressing-comments@w3.org Subject: LC Editorial Comment for WS-Addressing Core Specification This is an editorial comment. WSD wg has adopted a BNF style for designating pseudo schemas and used in WSDL 2.0 specifications consistently. The definition is available in the current WSDL 2.0 Core Language specification [1], in section 1.4.8. Using this style differentiates a pseudo schema from an actual example that contains a concrete schema or a document fragment. Further, it improves the readibility of the pseudo schemas. The values of attributes and elements are designated by schema types in italics when actual values are not used. I propose the wg to adopt the same pseudo schemas style to improve the readability of Example 2.1 and Example 3.1 in the WS-Addressing Core Specification [2] and whenever pseudo schemas are needed in the future for other WS-Addressing specs. I recommend referring to WSDL 2.0 Core Language specification for examples throughout. As an example, Example 3.1 states the following: <wsa:MessageID> xs:anyURI </wsa:MessageID> <wsa:RelatesTo RelationshipType="..."?>xs:anyURI</wsa:RelatesTo> <wsa:To>xs:anyURI</wsa:To> <wsa:Action>xs:anyURI</wsa:Action> <wsa:From>endpoint-reference</wsa:From> <wsa:ReplyTo>endpoint-reference</wsa:ReplyTo> <wsa:FaultTo>endpoint-reference</wsa:FaultTo> By adopting the style, xs:anyURI would be in italics, "endpoint-reference" should be replaced by wsa:EndpointReferenceType in italics. <wsa:MessageID> xs:anyURI </wsa:MessageID> <wsa:RelatesTo RelationshipType="..."?>xs:anyURI</wsa:RelatesTo> <wsa:To>xs:anyURI</wsa:To> <wsa:Action>xs:anyURI</wsa:Action> <wsa:From>wsa:EndpointReferenceType</wsa:From> <wsa:ReplyTo>wsa:EndpointReferenceType</wsa:ReplyTo> <wsa:FaultTo>wsa:EndpointReferenceType</wsa:FaultTo> Thanks, --umit [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-wsdl20-20050510/#bnfpseudoschemas <http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-wsdl20-20050510/#bnfpseudoschemas> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-ws-addr-core-20050331/ <http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-ws-addr-core-20050331/>
Received on Monday, 13 June 2005 18:08:37 UTC