Re: When you email about search...

Hi, Scott:

Yes. But it's a matter of bandwidth. There are bugs, there will be bugs, and
the analytics work will dig up more. But we won't have a "search"
initiative. I know it's a little mungie, but we have to reduce program
management spin where we can. (Or I'll get dizzy! ;-) )

No immediate action on anyone's part, though, so we can discuss next week,
if that's OK.

J
----------------------------
julee@adobe.com
@adobejulee

From:  Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com>
Date:  Friday, April 19, 2013 1:42 PM
To:  julee <julee@adobe.com>
Cc:  "public-wpd-analytics@w3.org" <public-wpd-analytics@w3.org>
Subject:  Re: When you email about search...

Well, second thought - let's leave Search in it's own bucket. There are
other search bugs in the list not related to analytics, and for the time
being I think we should keep them in this bucket.
~Scott



On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com> wrote:
> Sure, sounds good. Thanks for this, I'll include it.
> ~Scott
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Julee <julee@adobe.com> wrote:
>> Hi, Scott:
>> 
>> When you email about search, will you ask folks to try it out and file any
>> bugs against it under the search project?
>> 
>> http://project.webplatform.org/search/issues/open
>> 
>> If there are no serious issues ‹ if users are getting good results most of
>> the time ‹ I think we should collapse the search project under the analytics
>> project.
>> 
>> It's two things, but so closely related, I don't think we need a separate
>> project. Originally we had talked about using another appliance or something,
>> but if we're good, I don't want to even bring it up for beta.
>> 
>> Sound good?
>> 
>> J
>> ----------------------------
>> julee@adobe.com
>> @adobejulee
>