Call for Resolution - Static Documents PRs for TD, Binding Templates and Binding Registry

Dear all,

The transition requests for the TD 2.0 FPWD and Binding Registry DRY are approved. I have prepared the PRs ([1], [2], [3])  to create the static documents. Similarly, based on the group resolution, the binding templates’ new publication is ready. You will find the links for the PRs below, which can be merged in this week’s main call (which I cannot join). However, I have noticed some outdated assertive text in the TD spec that should be removed, making that PR [3] a normative one. Specifically, they were the assertions requiring the 1.0 and 1.1 context URLs (bullet points below [4]).

I guess that we are technically not allowed to make normative changes for an FPWD after transition request but if there can be an exception, it would be nice. If not, I can revert those changes or we can resubmit a transition request. Sorry for the complication.

[1]: https://github.com/w3c/wot-binding-registry/pull/38
[2]: https://github.com/w3c/wot-binding-templates/pull/442
[3]: https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/pull/2140
[4]: https://www.w3.org/TR/2023/REC-wot-thing-description11-20231205/#td-context-ns-thing-mandatory

Best regards,
Ege Korkan