- From: Ben Francis <ben@krellian.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 19:01:22 +0100
- To: "Kaebisch, Sebastian" <sebastian.kaebisch@siemens.com>
- Cc: "public-wot-wg@w3.org" <public-wot-wg@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 4 June 2024 18:01:39 UTC
On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 at 18:47, Ben Francis <ben@krellian.com> wrote: > Actually the *Thing Descriptions* of profile-compliant Things *are* a > subset of the TD 1.1 specification, at least with the current set of > profiles. They have been carefully designed such that a Consumer which does > not implement a given profile will just fall back to the defaults in the > protocol binding template and the Thing will still behave as the Consumer > expects. > BTW, if you are not convinced about this, please take a look at the Example 4 <https://w3c.github.io/wot-profile/#example-4> and Example 23 <https://w3c.github.io/wot-profile/#example-23> Thing Descriptions from the WoT Profile specification and tell me: - Which parts of the Thing Descriptions are a superset of TD 1.1 - Which affordances would confuse a generic TD 1.1 Consumer
Received on Tuesday, 4 June 2024 18:01:39 UTC