- From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 18:12:37 +0900
- To: public-wot-wg@w3.org
available at:
https://www.w3.org/2021/11/08-wot-discovery-minutes.html
also as text below.
Thanks a lot for taking the minutes, Andrea!
Kazuyuki
---
[1]W3C
[1] https://www.w3.org/
WoT Discovery
08 November 2021
[2]Agenda. [3]IRC log.
[2] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/WG_WoT_Discovery_WebConf#8_November_2021
[3] https://www.w3.org/2021/11/08-wot-discovery-irc
Attendees
Present
Andrea_Cimmino, Christian_Glomb, Cristiano_Aguzzi,
Kaz_Ashimura, Kunihiko_Toumura, Michael_McCool,
Tomoaki_Mizushima
Regrets
-
Chair
McCool
Scribe
acimmino
Contents
1. [4]Minutes
2. [5]Issue 190
3. [6]Issue 224
Meeting minutes
Minutes
meeting starts with reviewing the minutes
<kaz> [7]Nov-1
[7] https://www.w3.org/2021/11/01-wot-discovery-minutes.html
McCool: we should probably close the discussion over the XPath
and JsonPath data models
McCool: maybe we should add a topic for fragment identifiers
… and a topic for XPath response models
… to the corresponding issues
since no comments or objections are presented about the
minutes, they are approved
Issue 190
first issue is #190
<glomb> [8]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/190
[8] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/190
McCool: andrea presented an alternative
but it not retrocompatible
since it requires adding fields to the TDs
McCool: ...I have presented an alternative that does not
require more fields
everything happens on the id field
Andrea: the solution presented is not very RDF-friendly, it
will work of course, the there still the issue of having
different entities (Thing and ThingDescriptions) and the lack
of entities in the data
McCool reviews the comments of the issue, summarizing them for
the audience
Andrea: maybe we could use / instead of a query parameter for
indicating the TD view
McCool is typing the comments of andrea and cristiano in the
issue
<kaz> [9]RFC 8141
[9] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8141
McCool has summarised the discussion about how suitable the
solutions proposed are, and also, about the compatiblity of URN
with RDF as URIs
Issue 224
next issue is #224
<McCool> [10]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/224
[10] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/224
McCool: if a TD is submitted into a TDD and it lacks of type as
Thing
the directory should inject it
McCool adds the ideas been discussed to the issue.
McCool types the comments of the dicussion in the issue. He
proposes 3 alternatives for dealing with this issue
Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by
[11]scribe.perl version 159 (Fri Nov 5 17:37:14 2021 UTC).
[11] https://w3c.github.io/scribe2/scribedoc.html
Received on Monday, 10 January 2022 09:12:42 UTC