- From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 18:12:37 +0900
- To: public-wot-wg@w3.org
available at: https://www.w3.org/2021/11/08-wot-discovery-minutes.html also as text below. Thanks a lot for taking the minutes, Andrea! Kazuyuki --- [1]W3C [1] https://www.w3.org/ WoT Discovery 08 November 2021 [2]Agenda. [3]IRC log. [2] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/WG_WoT_Discovery_WebConf#8_November_2021 [3] https://www.w3.org/2021/11/08-wot-discovery-irc Attendees Present Andrea_Cimmino, Christian_Glomb, Cristiano_Aguzzi, Kaz_Ashimura, Kunihiko_Toumura, Michael_McCool, Tomoaki_Mizushima Regrets - Chair McCool Scribe acimmino Contents 1. [4]Minutes 2. [5]Issue 190 3. [6]Issue 224 Meeting minutes Minutes meeting starts with reviewing the minutes <kaz> [7]Nov-1 [7] https://www.w3.org/2021/11/01-wot-discovery-minutes.html McCool: we should probably close the discussion over the XPath and JsonPath data models McCool: maybe we should add a topic for fragment identifiers … and a topic for XPath response models … to the corresponding issues since no comments or objections are presented about the minutes, they are approved Issue 190 first issue is #190 <glomb> [8]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/190 [8] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/190 McCool: andrea presented an alternative but it not retrocompatible since it requires adding fields to the TDs McCool: ...I have presented an alternative that does not require more fields everything happens on the id field Andrea: the solution presented is not very RDF-friendly, it will work of course, the there still the issue of having different entities (Thing and ThingDescriptions) and the lack of entities in the data McCool reviews the comments of the issue, summarizing them for the audience Andrea: maybe we could use / instead of a query parameter for indicating the TD view McCool is typing the comments of andrea and cristiano in the issue <kaz> [9]RFC 8141 [9] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8141 McCool has summarised the discussion about how suitable the solutions proposed are, and also, about the compatiblity of URN with RDF as URIs Issue 224 next issue is #224 <McCool> [10]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/224 [10] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/224 McCool: if a TD is submitted into a TDD and it lacks of type as Thing the directory should inject it McCool adds the ideas been discussed to the issue. McCool types the comments of the dicussion in the issue. He proposes 3 alternatives for dealing with this issue Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by [11]scribe.perl version 159 (Fri Nov 5 17:37:14 2021 UTC). [11] https://w3c.github.io/scribe2/scribedoc.html
Received on Monday, 10 January 2022 09:12:42 UTC