[wot-discovery] minutes - 18 October 2021

available at:
  https://www.w3.org/2021/10/18-wot-discovery-minutes.html

also as text below.

Thanks a lot for taking the minutes, Farshid!

Kazuyuki

---
   [1]W3C

      [1] https://www.w3.org/

                             WoT Discovery

18 October 2021

   [2]IRC log.

      [2] https://www.w3.org/2021/10/18-wot-discovery-irc

Attendees

   Present
          Cristiano_Aguzzzi, Farshid_Tavakolizadeh, Kaz_Ashimura,
          Kunihiko_Toumura, Michael_McCool

   Regrets
          Christian_Glomb

   Chair
          McCool

   Scribe
          FarshidT

Contents

    1. [3]Minutes review
         1. [4]Sep 20th Minutes
         2. [5]Oct 4th Minutes
    2. [6]PRs
         1. [7]PR: Clarify validation statements (#230)
    3. [8]F2F action items
         1. [9]Simplified JSONPath
    4. [10]Next meeting

Meeting minutes

  Minutes review

    Sep 20th Minutes

   <McCool> [11]https://www.w3.org/2021/09/
   20-wot-discovery-minutes.html

     [11] https://www.w3.org/2021/09/20-wot-discovery-minutes.html

   no objections to publishing the minutes

    Oct 4th Minutes

   <kaz> [12]https://www.w3.org/2021/10/
   04-wot-discovery-minutes.html

     [12] https://www.w3.org/2021/10/04-wot-discovery-minutes.html

   McCool: Farshid to be added to guests list for this meeting

   no objections to publishing

  PRs

    PR: Clarify validation statements (#230)

   [13]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/pull/230

     [13] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/pull/230

   McCool: It would be good to add an assertion in the validation
   section to clarify the directory does the validation. Also, to
   say that the directory MAY reject the request if the input is
   invalid.

   [14]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/
   99#issuecomment-945823118

     [14] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/99#issuecomment-945823118

   no objections to merging

  F2F action items

   <kaz> [15]Day 1

     [15] https://www.w3.org/2021/10/05-wot-minutes.html

   <kaz> [16]Day 2

     [16] https://www.w3.org/2021/10/07-wot-minutes.html

   <kaz> [17]Open Day 1

     [17] https://www.w3.org/2021/10/11-wot-minutes.html

   <kaz> [18]Open Day 2

     [18] https://www.w3.org/2021/10/14-wot-minutes.html

    Simplified JSONPath

   McCool: simple keyword search

   McCool: could be added to appendix

   Farshid: or non-normative section in place

   Farshid: JSONPath is also used for selection

   Farshid: keyword search could also be complicated (search in
   array, dictionary key/values, etc). Limiting to root level
   would make it simple

   Cristiano: maybe simple keyword search (no jsonpath) would be
   better

   McCool: Agrees to JSONPath keyword search, limited to the top
   level.

   McCool: the keywork search would be a separate API e.g.
   /search/keyword?query=

   McCool: maybe limited to title and descriptions

   Farshid: string search is often not enough. What about datetime
   attributes?

   McCool: we need to mandate at least one way to allow searching.
   The directory could contain millions of entires.

   McCool: writing a issue to discuss the problem in detail

   [19]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/231

     [19] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/231

   Farshid: there could be many different simple use cases. It is
   hard to cover all.

   Kaz: we need to clarify the scenarios that we're addressing.

   Farshid: full text search on millions of items could longer
   than querying all and doing efficient filtering on the client
   side

   McCool: true but it would consume less networking resources

  Next meeting

   cancelled


    Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by
    [20]scribe.perl version 147 (Thu Jun 24 22:21:39 2021 UTC).

     [20] https://w3c.github.io/scribe2/scribedoc.html

Received on Monday, 10 January 2022 09:08:31 UTC