- From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 16:43:57 +0900
- To: public-wot-wg@w3.org
available at: https://www.w3.org/2021/10/18-wot-script-minutes.html also as text below. Thanks a lot for taking the minutes, Cristiano! Kazuyuki --- [1]W3C [1] https://www.w3.org/ WoT Scripting API 18 October 2021 [2]IRC log. [2] https://www.w3.org/2021/10/18-wot-script-irc Attendees Present Cristiano_Aguzzi, Daniel_Peintner, Kaz_Ashimura, Zoltan_Kis Regrets - Chair Daniel Scribe cris Contents 1. [3]Minutes 2. [4]quick updates 1. [5]F2F 3. [6]PRs Meeting minutes Minutes <dape> [7]https://www.w3.org/2021/09/20-wot-script-minutes.html [7] https://www.w3.org/2021/09/20-wot-script-minutes.html Daniel: last call was 27th of September … we talked about test fests and topics F2F meetining … we reviewed a PR for not found error … minutes are fine … any objections? <zkis> no <cris> no: ) Daniel: minutes approved quick updates F2F Daniel: we have a session next Wednesday about Scripting API <dape> [8]https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/ WG_WoT_Scripting_API_WebConf#18_October_2021 [8] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/WG_WoT_Scripting_API_WebConf#18_October_2021 Daniel: we have 45 minutes … we could talk about different topics: - how to configure binding layer - testfest results … currently we support only a formIndex for interaction with bindings … what do you think about it? Zoltan: I'd propose a different API to interact with bindings … maybe defined at Thing level Daniel: what do you mean? Zoltan: giving hints to the underlying API … possible not per-interaction Zoltan: WoT model is born to abstract low level interaction patterns, we shouldn't open it again Daniel: for example the consumer only knows http therefore it should be able to communicate this to the runtime. Kaz: What did people do during this PlugFest? … they might provide good feedback Daniel: true Cristiano: maybe we can also use the option parameter to choose a particular security schema Zoltan: yeah maybe it could be an array … and then the runtime would throw if not security schema matches Daniel: yeah we can provide options also to the exposer part Cristiano: seems good Daniel: I think we are having good points, I'll report those in the presentation to get more feedback Zoltan: it is better to strictly define the algorithms about how the selection is done Daniel: one topic that I want to talk about is discovery Cristiano: the downsized the scope, it is only http right now Daniel: ok and then we have the new Action Model … which is missing Zoltan: yeah we need to look at it Daniel: we have different action models … one "operational", in other words using op keywords … other more based on hypermedia control Zoltan: control objects might be a good way to describe the current spec Cristiano: right Daniel: similar to subscription object Kaz: in cases where you have multiple instances you have to keep track also of who started it … which creates complexities Cristiano: about discovery should we implement other ways of discovery? Zoltan: I think our API should be more focused on second phase Daniel: I like to have a convient API please support things "around me" Zoltan: we have a security problem there.. … in ocf this is not even allowed in one security realm. Cristiano: should we have different endpoints for first level discovery? Zoltan: we could but in another root object, cause I have security concerns PRs Daniel: we have an Open pr about alignment of typescript API with WebIDL Cristiano: there might be an error in emitEvent Daniel: ok to merge it? Zoltan: ok Kaz: ok Daniel: thank you <kaz> [adjourned] Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by [9]scribe.perl version 136 (Thu May 27 13:50:24 2021 UTC). [9] https://w3c.github.io/scribe2/scribedoc.html
Received on Tuesday, 30 November 2021 07:44:03 UTC