- From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 16:43:57 +0900
- To: public-wot-wg@w3.org
available at:
https://www.w3.org/2021/10/18-wot-script-minutes.html
also as text below.
Thanks a lot for taking the minutes, Cristiano!
Kazuyuki
---
[1]W3C
[1] https://www.w3.org/
WoT Scripting API
18 October 2021
[2]IRC log.
[2] https://www.w3.org/2021/10/18-wot-script-irc
Attendees
Present
Cristiano_Aguzzi, Daniel_Peintner, Kaz_Ashimura,
Zoltan_Kis
Regrets
-
Chair
Daniel
Scribe
cris
Contents
1. [3]Minutes
2. [4]quick updates
1. [5]F2F
3. [6]PRs
Meeting minutes
Minutes
<dape> [7]https://www.w3.org/2021/09/20-wot-script-minutes.html
[7] https://www.w3.org/2021/09/20-wot-script-minutes.html
Daniel: last call was 27th of September
… we talked about test fests and topics F2F meetining
… we reviewed a PR for not found error
… minutes are fine
… any objections?
<zkis> no
<cris> no: )
Daniel: minutes approved
quick updates
F2F
Daniel: we have a session next Wednesday about Scripting API
<dape> [8]https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/
WG_WoT_Scripting_API_WebConf#18_October_2021
[8] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/WG_WoT_Scripting_API_WebConf#18_October_2021
Daniel: we have 45 minutes
… we could talk about different topics: - how to configure
binding layer - testfest results
… currently we support only a formIndex for interaction with
bindings
… what do you think about it?
Zoltan: I'd propose a different API to interact with bindings
… maybe defined at Thing level
Daniel: what do you mean?
Zoltan: giving hints to the underlying API
… possible not per-interaction
Zoltan: WoT model is born to abstract low level interaction
patterns, we shouldn't open it again
Daniel: for example the consumer only knows http therefore it
should be able to communicate this to the runtime.
Kaz: What did people do during this PlugFest?
… they might provide good feedback
Daniel: true
Cristiano: maybe we can also use the option parameter to choose
a particular security schema
Zoltan: yeah maybe it could be an array
… and then the runtime would throw if not security schema
matches
Daniel: yeah we can provide options also to the exposer part
Cristiano: seems good
Daniel: I think we are having good points, I'll report those in
the presentation to get more feedback
Zoltan: it is better to strictly define the algorithms about
how the selection is done
Daniel: one topic that I want to talk about is discovery
Cristiano: the downsized the scope, it is only http right now
Daniel: ok and then we have the new Action Model
… which is missing
Zoltan: yeah we need to look at it
Daniel: we have different action models
… one "operational", in other words using op keywords
… other more based on hypermedia control
Zoltan: control objects might be a good way to describe the
current spec
Cristiano: right
Daniel: similar to subscription object
Kaz: in cases where you have multiple instances you have to
keep track also of who started it
… which creates complexities
Cristiano: about discovery should we implement other ways of
discovery?
Zoltan: I think our API should be more focused on second phase
Daniel: I like to have a convient API please support things
"around me"
Zoltan: we have a security problem there..
… in ocf this is not even allowed in one security realm.
Cristiano: should we have different endpoints for first level
discovery?
Zoltan: we could but in another root object, cause I have
security concerns
PRs
Daniel: we have an Open pr about alignment of typescript API
with WebIDL
Cristiano: there might be an error in emitEvent
Daniel: ok to merge it?
Zoltan: ok
Kaz: ok
Daniel: thank you
<kaz> [adjourned]
Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by
[9]scribe.perl version 136 (Thu May 27 13:50:24 2021 UTC).
[9] https://w3c.github.io/scribe2/scribedoc.html
Received on Tuesday, 30 November 2021 07:44:03 UTC