- From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 18:20:05 +0900
- To: public-wot-ig@w3.org, public-wot-wg@w3.org
availabl at:
https://www.w3.org/2021/04/12-wot-sec-minutes.html
also as text below.
Thanks a lot for taking the minutes, Elena!
Kazuyuki
---
[1]W3C
[1] https://www.w3.org/
WoT Security
12 April 2021
[2]IRC log.
[2] https://www.w3.org/2021/04/12-wot-sec-irc
Attendees
Present
Elena_Reshetova, Kaz_Ashimura, Michael_McCol,
Philipp_Blum, Tomoaki_Mizushima
Regrets
-
Chair
McCool
Scribe
elena
Contents
1. [3]minutes from March 8
2. [4]PR 1086 for TD canonicalization
3. [5]issues
Meeting minutes
minutes from March 8
[6]March-8
[6] https://www.w3.org/2021/03/08-wot-sec-minutes.html
<citrullin> Michael, you are not in the call anymore
minutes accepted
PR 1086 for TD canonicalization
<kaz> [7]PR 1086
[7] https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/pull/1086
issues
<McCool> [8]https://github.com/w3c/wot-security/issues/194
wot-security Issue 194 - Provide guidance on use of OAuth 2
flows
[8] https://github.com/w3c/wot-security/issues/194
<McCool> [9]->
[9] https://w3c.github.io/wot-usecases/#oauth
McCool: what is the good location for this text? It is
currently in use cases
<kaz> s/#oauth|#oauth WoT Use Cases Editor's draft - 5.7.1
OAuth2 Flows|
Philipp: is it the intention of best practices only for
recommendation or as must?
McCool: Best Practices are suggestions, but if you want to
satisfy a profile, they would be normative
McCool: profiles are normative, so we have to do a capital must
McCool: but we might have to copy assertions to normative
profile doc
McCool: what should our recommendations be?
McCool puts possible recommendations to the issue comment
these recommendations should part of security best practices
doc
McCool: can anyone volunteer to extract the relevant parts and
move it to the Best Practices doc?
McCool: we still have to decide if we publish Best Practices
separately
Philipp volunteers
McCool: object security, issue 185, putting a comment
[10]https://github.com/w3c/wot-security/issues/185
[10] https://github.com/w3c/wot-security/issues/185
McCool: do you have any examples where you would want to use
object security?
<citrullin> Sorry, I got a package
McCool: somebody needs to think about object security
McCool mentions Ben in the issue comment, maybe Ben can also
take a look on this
McCool: next issue is PR [11]https://github.com/w3c/
wot-thing-description/pull/1058
[11] https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/pull/1058
<citrullin> I wanted to take a look into signing objects.
Combining it it with DIDs and a DLT (Hyperledger for example).
Taking a look into WebThings is a good idea. Will do that in
the future.
McCool: this should be ok and hopefully merged soon
McCool: PR [12]https://github.com/w3c/wot-security/issues/196
still has some confusion between DoS and DDoS
[12] https://github.com/w3c/wot-security/issues/196
McCool puts a comment there
Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by
[13]scribe.perl version 127 (Wed Dec 30 17:39:58 2020 UTC).
[13] https://w3c.github.io/scribe2/scribedoc.html
Received on Monday, 24 May 2021 09:20:10 UTC