[wot-security] minutes - 8 February 2021

available at:
  https://www.w3.org/2021/02/08-wot-sec-minutes.html

also as text below.

Thanks a lot for taking the minutes, Oliver!

Kazuyuki

---
   [1]W3C

      [1] https://www.w3.org/

                              WoT Security

08 February 2021

   [2]IRC log.

      [2] https://www.w3.org/2021/02/08-wot-sec-irc

Attendees

   Present
          Cristiano_Aguzzi, Elena_Reshetova, Kaz_Ashimura,
          Michael_McCool, Oliver_Pfaff, Tomoaki_Mizushima

   Regrets
          -

   Chair
          McCool

   Scribe
          Oliver

Contents

    1. [3]Prev minutes
    2. [4]Agenda bashing
    3. [5]Quick updates
    4. [6]Issues and PRs
    5. [7]Accessibility

Meeting minutes

  Prev minutes

   <kaz> [8]Feb-1

      [8] https://www.w3.org/2021/02/01-wot-sec-minutes.html

   Minutes: review of the minutes WoT-Security call 2021-02-01 -
   no objections raised, are considered published

  Agenda bashing

   <cris> [9]https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/pull/289

      [9] https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/pull/289

  Quick updates

   Quick updates: none

  Issues and PRs

   Issues and PRs: starting now

   First about [10]https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/pull/
   289 handling of "Security" section in partial TD needs
   consideration

     [10] https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/pull/289

   A delta approach is suggested: Security section from parent TD
   is inherited when partial TD does not contain a Security
   section. A partial TD may override Security in parent TD by
   having an own Security section

   As follow-up a new issue shall be created that considers
   Security scheme selection

   Other follow-up: Management API requirements and Management of
   security items (keys, shared secrets...) also to be addressed
   inn to-be-created issues

   <kaz> [11]algorithm at 5.2.1 Use an ExposedThingInit - Preview
   of wot-scripting-api PR 289

     [11] https://pr-preview.s3.amazonaws.com/relu91/wot-scripting-api/pull/289.html#use-an-exposedthinginit

   <McCool> [12]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/99

     [12] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/99

   <cris> [13]https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/issues/287

     [13] https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/issues/287

   New issue "Add formal validation process" filed in
   WoT-Discovery repo: [14]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/
   issues/1043

     [14] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/1043

   <McCool> [15]https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/
   issues/1043

     [15] https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/issues/1043

   <McCool> raised a TD issue linking to this and the issue in
   scripting

   Discussion of [16]https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/
   pull/1032 more clarification needed, could be done by extending
   example

     [16] https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/pull/1032

   WoT-Discovery team should indicate the directions in which
   they'd expect to have more examples

   [17]https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/pull/1042
   needs update with respect to response behavior

     [17] https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/pull/1042

  Accessibility

   <kaz> [18]wot issue 953 - Plan a meeting with APA

     [18] https://github.com/w3c/wot/issues/953

   [19]https://github.com/w3c/wot-security/issues/166 added note
   on "progressive disclosure" principle

     [19] https://github.com/w3c/wot-security/issues/166

   <McCool> [20]https://github.com/w3c/wot-security/issues/166

     [20] https://github.com/w3c/wot-security/issues/166

   Meeting closed

   <kaz> [adjourned]


    Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by
    [21]scribe.perl version 127 (Wed Dec 30 17:39:58 2020 UTC).

     [21] https://w3c.github.io/scribe2/scribedoc.html

Received on Monday, 1 March 2021 06:22:01 UTC