W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wot-wg@w3.org > July 2021

[wot-architecture] minutes - 29 April 2021

From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 17:21:02 +0900
Message-ID: <87fswk2b9t.wl-ashimura@w3.org>
To: public-wot-wg@w3.org
available at:

also as text below.




      [1] https://www.w3.org/

                             íV DRAFT íV
                            WoT Architecture

29 April 2021

   [2]Agenda. [3]IRC log.

      [2] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/WG_WoT_Architecture_WebConf#April_29th.2C_2021

      [3] https://www.w3.org/2021/04/29-wot-arch-irc


          Daniel_Peintner, Kaz_Ashimura, Michael_McCool,
          Sebastian_Kaebisch, Tomoaki_Mizushima





    1. [4]Minutes
    2. [5]Architecture
         1. [6]PR 590
         2. [7]PR 586
         3. [8]Issue 453
    3. [9]Profile
    4. [10]AOB

Meeting minutes



     [11] https://www.w3.org/2021/04/15-wot-arch-minutes.html

   McCool: (goes through the previous minutes)
   íK wondering about whether the Architecture 1.1 spec needs tests
   or not
   íK any objections to publish the minutes?




   McCool: Lagally can't join today, so we can't merge major PRs
   íK but some of them could be merged

    PR 590

   [12]wot-architecture PR 590 - Move Partial TD definition to
   right place in list

     [12] https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/pull/590

   McCool: this is editorial and can be merged


    PR 586

   [13]wot-architecture PR 586 - Add terminology from binding

     [13] https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/pull/586

   McCool: Ege is moving some of the vocabulary

   Sebastian: this is transfer from wot-binding to

   McCool: any vocabulary within wot-thing-description as well?

   Sebastian: will check

   McCool: (adds comments to PR 586)
   íK terminology from binding templates


   McCool: (goes through wot-architecture issues)

    Issue 453

   [14]wot-architecture Issue 453 - Create terminology definition
   for "partial TD"

     [14] https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/issues/453

   McCool: let's see the spec draft

   [15]wot-architecture ED - 3. Terminology

     [15] https://w3c.github.io/wot-architecture/#terminology

   McCool: let me add a comment about this
   íK (goes back to Issue 453, and adds comments)

   [16]McCool's comments

     [16] https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/issues/453#issuecomment-829281787

   McCool: (adds the link for the PR for Issue 453)

   [17]wot-architecture PR 590 - Move Partial TD definition to
   right place in list

     [17] https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/pull/590


   McCool: now let's go for Profile
   íK but Ben or Lagally is not here today
   íK we should focus on one profile

   Sebastian: think we definitely need Lagally here

   McCool: right
   íK we won't remove anything today without Lagally's
   íK but would avoid old discussions

   Sebastian: ok
   íK this is our direction
   íK making a baseline document for further profile in the future
   íK we should concentrate on that
   íK think the protocol part is safe
   íK to get consensus

   McCool: yeah
   íK think the mechanism here is fine
   íK and we should focus on one profile
   íK will give a comment to this PR 79
   íK Sebastian, have you gone through Ben's PRs?

   Sebastian: most of them
   íK Ben is following the approach of node-wot

   McCool: yeah

   Daniel: one issue is...
   íK PUT must report data
   íK but that's impossible for TD

   McCool: acknowledging what to get
   íK maybe we need some flag

   Daniel: something to report for another payload

   McCool: PUT for new property
   íK might need something for security key
   íK we could always recommend something

   Sebastian: checking with Klaus as well
   íK he mentioned maybe some disadvantage would be caching

   McCool: possibly need to update the cache every time
   íK we should have discussion including Ben and Lagally
   íK (quickly goes through some more PRs)

   [18]wot-profile PR 79 - Open

     [18] https://github.com/w3c/wot-profile/pull/79/files

   New Profile Mechanism section

   Sebastian: use case description to be added to the Use Cases

   McCool: yeah

   [19]wot-profile PR 78 - Remove WoT Core Data Model section

     [19] https://github.com/w3c/wot-profile/pull/78/files

   McCool: (next, goes through PR 78)

   Sebastian: think he's providing good guidelines here

   McCool: yeah
   íK this is very concrete
   íK removing all the data model descriptions
   íK need to review the details with Lagally
   íK (adds a tag "pre-restructure" to the PR)

   [20]wot-profile PR 57 - Canonical representation 2

     [20] https://github.com/w3c/wot-profile/pull/57

   McCool: (adds comments)

   [21]McCool's comments

     [21] https://github.com/w3c/wot-profile/pull/57#issuecomment-829299684


   Sebastian: wondering about the timeline

   McCool: we should establish one specific profile as the basis
   íK we need to check with Ben and Lagally
   íK let's send an email to them to move forward

   Sebastian: ok

   McCool: we should be aware of the summer vacation season

   Sebastian: ok


    Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by
    [22]scribe.perl version 131 (Sat Apr 24 15:23:43 2021 UTC).

     [22] https://w3c.github.io/scribe2/scribedoc.html

Received on Monday, 12 July 2021 08:21:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 12 July 2021 08:21:13 UTC