W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wot-wg@w3.org > July 2021

[wot-usecases] minutes - 9 March 2021

From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 13:29:22 +0900
Message-ID: <87h7h040kd.wl-ashimura@w3.org>
To: public-wot-ig@w3.org, public-wot-wg@w3.org
available at:

also as text below.

Thanks a lot for taking the minutes, Philipp!



      [1] https://www.w3.org/

                             WoT Use Cases

09 March 2021

   [2]Agenda. [3]IRC log.

      [2] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/IG_UseCase_WebConf#Agenda_9.3.

      [3] https://www.w3.org/2021/03/09-wot-uc-irc


          Christine Perey, Georg_Schneider, Herve_Pruvost,
          Kaz_Ashimura, Michael_Lagally, Michael_McCool,
          Philip_Tran, Philipp_Blum, Sebastian_Kaebisch,



          citrullin, kaz


    1. [4]Preliminary
    2. [5]Prev minutes
    3. [6]Use case note publication
    4. [7]PR 102 - Linked building data use case
    5. [8]PR 110
    6. [9]Summary of resolutions

Meeting minutes


   Lagally: We changed the branch master to main. Please change
   your local branch.

  Prev minutes

   <kaz> [10]Feb-23

     [10] https://www.w3.org/2021/02/23-wot-uc-minutes.html

   Lagally: Any change requests, any objections, before it gets

   Lagally: I hear no objections, so it gets published.

  Use case note publication

   Lagally: 2 week review starts from now, and publication
   decision during the vF2F

   Resolution: 2 week review starts from now (after the call) and
   publication decision during the vF2F

   (discussion on March 18 and final decision on March 25)

  PR 102 - Linked building data use case

   Lagally: Let's take a look into the PRs.

   [11]Linked building data use case

     [11] https://github.com/w3c/wot-usecases/pull/102

   Georg: In this use-case with focused on leverage things model.

   Lagally: is it a standard?

   Georg: It isn't a standard.

   <kaz> [12]4.12.1 Linking Smart Building Things and BIM Models

     [12] https://pr-preview.s3.amazonaws.com/w3c/wot-usecases/102/7fb6cbc...w3c-lbd-cg:61e26b2.html#smart-building-things

   Georg: the goal of the use-case is to show how to automate
   commisson of control algorithms.

   McCool: We need to align with the discovery for that.

   Georg presents the PR in detail

   Lagally: Sorry for jumping over you, mc, but it feels more
   relaxed to let the author present the PR first.

   McCool: I have a question. Are these examples based on a
   product or a thought experiment?

   Georg: It is based on an open source project.
   ˇ­ but the extention is based on a thought experiment.

   <McCool> [13]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/blob/main/


     [13] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/blob/main/proposals/geolocation.md

   McCool: Let's discuss this further. Let's merge it for now and
   continue working on it.

   <GeorgSchneider> W.r.t. different protocols we reference
   dependendies to [14]https://w3c.github.io/

   wot-binding-templates/ protocol bindings

     [14] https://w3c.github.io/wot-binding-templates/

   <kaz> (Georg and Herve are guests from the Linked Smart
   Building CG)

   <GeorgSchneider> Georg and Herv¨¦ are members of W3C Linked
   Building Data Group

   Kaz: The content is great. On the other hand, in the use-case
   context it should have a more application-specific title from
   the user's viewpoint.

   McCool: That is a great point.

   Georg: I like the suggestion.

   Kaz: regarding your affiliations, please let me check the W3C
   procedure within the Team.

   <GeorgSchneider> [15]Link to Open Smart Home Dataset

     [15] https://github.com/TechnicalBuildingSystems/OpenSmartHomeData

   Lagally: I merge it as it is once Kaz get clarification on the
   affiliations. We can change the title etc. later on.

  PR 110

   McCool: I agree on commenting out incomplete things and work on

   <kaz> [16]PR 110 - Preparing WG note publication

     [16] https://github.com/w3c/wot-usecases/pull/110

   <kaz> [17]Preview

     [17] https://pr-preview.s3.amazonaws.com/w3c/wot-usecases/pull/110.html

   McCool: like kaz's comment, the title of "4.3.1 Smart Building"
   sounds too broad
   ˇ­ maybe the category 4.3 could be "Smart Buildings" and the use
   case 4.3.1 should have a more application-specific title

   McCool: Going back to retail. Is it one big use-case? I would
   leave it for now like it is. But I would like to break it up in
   the future.

   McCool: Transportation includes public transportation and
   logistics. We can leave it for now, but it should be in

   Sebastian: Coming back to the automotive use-case. I talked to
   BMW and they would like to add a use-case for the ontoloy. I
   cannot guarantee the timing for getting it done.

   McCool: We have some ascii diagrams. We should make real
   diagrams in the future.

   Lagally: I agree. For the moment it is better than nothing.

   McCool: Short codes for the use-case is useful for refering to
   them in the requirements. For now I would supress them, it
   reduces the noise.

   Lagally: I will merge it for now then. So that people can work
   on it with PRs.

Summary of resolutions

    1. [18]2 week review starts from now (after the call) and
       publication decision during the vF2F

    Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by
    [19]scribe.perl version 127 (Wed Dec 30 17:39:58 2020 UTC).

     [19] https://w3c.github.io/scribe2/scribedoc.html

Received on Monday, 12 July 2021 04:29:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 12 July 2021 04:29:31 UTC