- From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:52:11 +0900
- To: public-wot-ig@w3.org, public-wot-wg@w3.org
available at:
https://www.w3.org/2020/12/09-wot-minutes.html
also as text below.
Thanks a lot for taking the minutes, Sebastian!
Kazuyuki
---
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
WoT-IG/WG
09 Dec 2020
[2]Agenda
[2] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Main_WoT_WebConf#9_December_2020
Attendees
Present
Kaz_Ashimura, Ege_Korkan, Jennifer_Lin, Kevin_Olotu,
Kunihiko_Toumura, Sebastian_Kaebisch, Michael_Koster,
Michael_Lagally, David_Ezell, Tomoaki_Mizushima,
Ryuichi_Matsukura, Michael_McCool
Regrets
Chair
McCool
Scribe
sebastian, kaz
Contents
* [3]Topics
1. [4]Publication follow-up
2. [5]Quick updates
3. [6]Minutes
4. [7]upcoming events
5. [8]TD Editor Tool
6. [9]Prev minutes
7. [10]TF report
* [11]Summary of Action Items
* [12]Summary of Resolutions
__________________________________________________________
<McCool> agenda:
[13]https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Main_WoT_WebConf#9_December_
2020
[13] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Main_WoT_WebConf#9_December_2020
<kaz> [14]updated calendar table wiki
[14] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Main_Page#WebConf_Meetings
<kaz> scribenick: sebastian
Publication follow-up
still some clean-up have to be done
please check schedule for the CR plans
stable drafts should be available in May 2021
Quick updates
no marketing call next week
there is a joint OPC UA call
participants would like to join this call as well please ping
sebastian
there is a new Use Case call, Tuesday 14-15 CET
Ege shows an issue about new web page
[15]https://github.com/w3c/wot/issues/954
[15] https://github.com/w3c/wot/issues/954
Ege: there is a new feature on github that allows discussions
which are something like issues but more Q&A oriented
Kaz: I'm OK with using this Discussions feature, but please
clarify which WoT repos to use this. Also please note that
GitHub Issues are used to record problems and requirements for
REC-Track specifications especially during the CR-PR periods
Lagally: worried about unclear situation between issue and
discussion area
Kaz: we should evaluate how useful this is
McCool: propose do not adopt this for now and wait for the
experiences from Ege
Lagally: what is the main benefit compared to issues?
Ege: you can ask question without creating issues
McCool: lets clarify this in the next marketing call
<kaz> kaz: +1
<Ege> [16]https://github.com/github/feedback/discussions/2861
seems that there is interest for it though :)
[16] https://github.com/github/feedback/discussions/2861
no response yet about contribution from non-members
what is the status about the ITU-T liaison?
no news yet. we should ping them again
Minutes
we have not received any objections about the TPAC minutes
that mean we will transfer the minutes to the public
<McCool> proposal: to publish the TPAC 2020 minutes for the WoT
F2F and joint calls
no objections
RESOLUTION: to publish the TPAC 2020 minutes for the WoT F2F
and joint calls
upcoming events
there is a ASDF meeting next Monday, Dec 14, 14-15:30 UTC
<scribe> agenda:
[17]https://github.com/ietf-wg-asdf/asdf-working-group-notes/bl
ob/main/agendas/2020-12-14-agenda.md
[17] https://github.com/ietf-wg-asdf/asdf-working-group-notes/blob/main/agendas/2020-12-14-agenda.md
Sebastian will show a SDF <--> Thing Model tool
McCool: is there a JSON Schema meeting?
Koster: not sure
the APA meeting was deferred to end of Jan 2021
tomorrow there will be the Spatial Data meeting
[18]https://github.com/w3c/wot/issues/939
[18] https://github.com/w3c/wot/issues/939
agenda is extended with Architecture
the main outcome should be what is next. shall we have examples
provided in the TD spec or shall we have a separate nore
document special for Spatial Data
however, we should have expert from both side for this
Jennifer: I can invite someone from Hexagon and ask for support
Kaz: we should ask Spatial Data group this beforehand
Lagally: I will ask this
<McCool shows some use cases about geo location>
<kaz> [19]Smart City Geolocation Use Case
[19] https://w3c.github.io/wot-usecases/#smart-city
status about Microsoft DTDL meeting
Lagally: doodle not successful yet
Kaz: maybe we could invite them to the TD call as well. there
are several possible options from our side.
Sebastian will offer to come to the TD meeting
TD Editor Tool
<inserted> scribenick: kaz
Sebastian: (explains the Edi{TD}or tool, an opensource TD
editor tool)
Kevin: (adds some more descriptions)
... modeling support use case
Sebastian: first version available
... (shows a demo)
... (TD code on the left side and parameter GUI on the right
side)
... (step by step generation for TD)
... you can add forms and delete them
[20]GitHub repo for Editdor
[20] https://github.com/eclipse/editdor
Sebastian: it's just a first version
... how to use vocabulary, context, etc., to be added
... please have fun with it!
McCool: directory integration would be interesting
Prev minutes
[21]Dec-2
[21] https://www.w3.org/2020/12/02-wot-minutes.html
McCool: who was "UNKNOWN SPEAKER"?
Lagally: should be me
<sebastian> scribenick: sebastian
no objections
Kaz will fix some typos before publication
Sebastian will discuss possible Christmas party next week
TF report
Coralie joined marketing call about URL topic of future web
page
please check the task force descripion
[22]https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/pull/100
[22] https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/pull/100
Lagally: we carry all requirements from architecture to the use
case repo
McCool: there will be no security and discovery call next week
adjourn
Summary of Action Items
Summary of Resolutions
1. [23]to publish the TPAC 2020 minutes for the WoT F2F and
joint calls
[End of minutes]
__________________________________________________________
Minutes formatted by David Booth's [24]scribe.perl version
1.152 ([25]CVS log)
$Date: 2021/01/11 05:51:05 $
[24] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
[25] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Monday, 11 January 2021 05:52:18 UTC