[wot-discovery] minutes - 14 June 2021

available at:
  https://www.w3.org/2021/06/14-wot-discovery-minutes.html

also as text below.

Thanks a lot for taking the minutes, Andrea!

Kazuyuki

---
   [1]W3C

      [1] https://www.w3.org/

                             WoT Discovery

14 June 2021

   [2]IRC log.

      [2] https://www.w3.org/2021/06/14-wot-discovery-irc

Attendees

   Present
          Andrea_Cimmino, Cristiano_Aguzzi, David_Ezell,
          Farshid_Tavakolizadeh, Kaz_Ashimura, Kunihiko_Toumura,
          Michael_McCool, Tomoaki_Mizushima

   Regrets
          Christian_Glomb

   Chair
          McCool

   Scribe
          acimmino

Contents

    1. [3]Agenda
    2. [4]Minutes
    3. [5]PRs
         1. [6]PR 179
         2. [7]PR 168
         3. [8]PR 204
         4. [9]PR 206
    4. [10]F2F
    5. [11]Testing

Meeting minutes

   meeting starts

  Agenda

   McCool: we have several PR and then we should discuss the F2F

   and then we should talk about testing

  Minutes

   <McCool> [12]https://www.w3.org/2021/06/
   07-wot-discovery-minutes.html June-7

     [12] https://www.w3.org/2021/06/07-wot-discovery-minutes.html

   first, minutes from last meeting are review

   <kaz> [13]Agenda:

     [13] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/WG_WoT_Discovery_WebConf#14_June_2021

   McCool: ...regarding QR code, "can't" should be change to
   'don't have to'

   <kaz> (fixed)

   since no objections are presented, minutes are published

  PRs

   now PRs are going to be checked

    PR 179

   <kaz> [14]PR 179 - Replace interaction affordances in directory
   TD with a single link to its API endpoint

     [14] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/pull/179

   first PR review is #179

   McCool: ...this PR seems to not have consensus, although many
   of the things were addressed.

   McCool: ...let's close this PR, although not right now so Ben
   can respond

    PR 168

   <kaz> [15]PR 168 - Add alternative payload format

     [15] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/pull/168

   next PR is #168

   mccool types in the issue the main points of discussion

   McCool: let's leave this PR util the author, christian glomb,
   is present

    PR 204

   <kaz> [16]PR 204

     [16] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/pull/204

   next PR is #204

   this PR only renames ids, therefore, and since no objections
   are presented

   PR is merged

   next PR is #205

   since no objection is presented, PR is merged

    PR 206

   <kaz> [17]PR 206 - Revert to use UUID URN as system-generated
   TD identifier

     [17] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/pull/206

   next PR is #206

   PR is closed

  F2F

   next Topic is F2F

   McCool: ....we have to decide which day we will do discovery
   stuff
   … first proposal would be mid-late jun
   … we could have a discovery meeting during F2F
   … so which day shall be the meeting?
   … date could be 30th of June
   … we can't use the 30th because is opening day
   … 23 of June is the alternative date
   … next meeting will be 21 of June, scribe: Farshid

   mccool is drafting the agenda for next meeting

   mccool updates the cancellations file

  Testing

   <FarshidT> [18]https://github.com/farshidtz/
   wot-discovery-testing/blob/main/directory/example/report.csv

     [18] https://github.com/farshidtz/wot-discovery-testing/blob/main/directory/example/report.csv

   next topic is testing

   particularly, reporting

   <kaz> (Kaz asks McCool if the call on June 21 will be a 2-hour
   call or a 1-hour call. McCool clarifies it will be a 1-hour
   call.)

   Farshid: ...in this report we have assertionID, and the status
   (tat can be passed or failed) and then a column with the
   percentage of success passing the test

   McCool: how is assigned the pass, skip, or fail

   Farshid: if 1 is passed it is marked as passed and then it
   depends on the rest of tests passed, in that way the percentage
   is computed

   McCool: we could have two tables, one with all the assertions
   where things are passed, failed, or skyped

   McCool: the last column should be a list of test ids
   … the second column should contain a list of those test ids,
   and if it was passed or failed

   Farshid: we could have them in just one table

   McCool: ...yes that could be a solution also
   … in that way if something fails you can track down what

   McCool: we want to deal with the two major implementations for
   directories

   <McCool> [19]https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/blob/main/
   events/2021.06.Online/TD/templates/implementations/intel.html

     [19] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/blob/main/events/2021.06.Online/TD/templates/implementations/intel.html

   <FarshidT> example github.io nested file serving: [20]https://
   w3c.github.io/wot-discovery/USE-CASES/

     [20] https://w3c.github.io/wot-discovery/USE-CASES/

   <kaz> [adjourned]


    Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by
    [21]scribe.perl version 136 (Thu May 27 13:50:24 2021 UTC).

     [21] https://w3c.github.io/scribe2/scribedoc.html

Received on Monday, 2 August 2021 10:58:44 UTC