[Scripting] minutes - 22 February 2021

available at:
  https://www.w3.org/2021/02/22-wot-script-minutes.html

also as text below.

Thanks a lot for taking the minutes, Daniel!

Kazuyuki

---
   [1]W3C

      [1] https://www.w3.org/

                           WoT Scripting API

22 February 2021

   [2]Agenda. [3]IRC log.

      [2] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/WG_WoT_Scripting_API_WebConf#22_February_2021
      [3] https://www.w3.org/2021/02/22-wot-script-irc

Attendees

   Present
          Cristiano_Aguzzi, Daniel_Peintner, Kaz_Ashimura,
          Philipp_Blum, Tomoaki_Mizushima, Zoltan_Kis

   Regrets
          -

   Chair
          Daniel

   Scribe
          dape

Contents

    1. [4]Previous minutes
    2. [5]Quick Updates
    3. [6]PR 289 - Add definitions for partialTD
    4. [7]Issue 302 - ActionHandler returning InteractionInput
       always
    5. [8]Does PropertyMap need to be different for reading and
       writing a value?
    6. [9]Issue 300 - Should title be mandatory in
       ExposedThingInit?

Meeting minutes

  Previous minutes

   [10]Feb-15

     [10] https://www.w3.org/2021/02/15-wot-script-minutes.html

   --> no objections --> minutes approved

  Quick Updates

   Daniel: F2F March 2021 - Scripting Topics

   [11]March F2F wiki

     [11] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/F2F_meeting,_March_2021#Scripting|Virtual

   Zoltan: Shared doc?

   Daniel: +1

   Zoltan: Will do

   <cris> +1

   Zoltan: 60-70 minutes

  PR 289 - Add definitions for partialTD

   [12]PR 289

     [12] https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/pull/289

   Cristiano: incorporated comments
   … updated examples
   … took into account ZK comment
   … plan to add more examples
   … with security

   Daniel: maybe split example in one view

   Zoltan: Make sense
   … approved PR

   Cristiano: Can work on split screen
   … should talk to TD folks as well
   … to be consistent

   Daniel: PR ready?

   ZK/CA: Yes. Add examples later

   Zoltan: Small PRs

   <zkis> discuss during the F2F about a

   Zoltan: section in TD about generate TDs

   Daniel: related discussion, see [13]https://github.com/w3c/
   wot-thing-description/issues/1047#issuecomment-781383187

     [13] https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/issues/1047#issuecomment-781383187

   Cristiano: proposed in TD call to merge ourt work
   … 1. create partial TD
   … 2. Create TD

   Zoltan: issue needs owner

   Cristiano: I am reviewing it... PR from Sebastian
   … I opened related issue in scripting API, [14]https://
   github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/issues/304

     [14] https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/issues/304

  Issue 302 - ActionHandler returning InteractionInput always

   [15]https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/issues/302

     [15] https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/issues/302

   Zoltan: don't think it is necessary.. object can be null

   Cristiano: beneficial to state null
   … clearer to implementer

   Zoltan: WebIDL choose to do it that way

   Cristiano: use of nullable objects?

   <zkis> [16]https://heycam.github.io/webidl/#idl-nullable-type

     [16] https://heycam.github.io/webidl/#idl-nullable-type

   Cristiano: see discussion here, [17]https://github.com/w3c/
   wot-scripting-api/issues/302 Issue 302#issuecomment-783342412

     [17] https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/issues/302

  Does PropertyMap need to be different for reading and writing a value?

   [18]See issue 293

     [18] https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/issues/293

   Cristiano: I would expect PropertyMapOutput and
   PropertyMapInput
   … algorithm is fine also

   Zoltan: tag review might not like PropertyMap
   … interface map like

   <zkis> [19]https://heycam.github.io/
   webidl/#dfn-maplike-declaration

     [19] https://heycam.github.io/webidl/#dfn-maplike-declaration

   [20]Comments on issue 293

     [20] https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/issues/293#issuecomment-783349553

  Issue 300 - Should title be mandatory in ExposedThingInit?

   [21]Issue 300

     [21] https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/issues/300

   Daniel: I can see pros and cons

   Cristiano: No strong opinion either
   … can see McCools points also

   Zoltan: Since title is required we might want to require it
   … or we keep issue open since we have good use-case

   Cristiano: Yes/no decision

   Daniel: i think title should be optional, up to the runtime

   Zoltan: I don't like up to the runtime, should be standardized
   … implementation can reject

   <kaz> [adjourned]


    Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by
    [22]scribe.perl version 127 (Wed Dec 30 17:39:58 2020 UTC).

     [22] https://w3c.github.io/scribe2/scribedoc.html

Received on Monday, 26 April 2021 10:50:35 UTC