W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wot-wg@w3.org > September 2020

[wot-discovery][DRAFT] minutes - 21 September 2020

From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 20:11:21 +0900
Message-ID: <87h7rii2au.wl-ashimura@w3.org>
To: public-wot-wg@w3.org
available at:

also as text below.

Thanks a lot for taking the minutes, Andrea!



      [1] http://www.w3.org/

                               - DRAFT -

                             WoT Discovery

21 Sep 2020


      [2] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/WG_WoT_Discovery_WebConf#21_September_2020


          Kaz_Ashimura, Andrea_Cimmino, Michael_McCool,
          Kunihiko_Toumura, Cristiano_Aguzzi, Tomoaki_Mizushima





     * [3]Topics
         1. [4]Prev minutes
         2. [5]Edge computing PoC
         3. [6]TPAC agenda review
         4. [7]PRs
         5. [8]Issues
     * [9]Summary of Action Items
     * [10]Summary of Resolutions

   <kaz> scribenick: andrea_cimmino

Prev minutes

   Meeting starts reviewing the minutes

   <kaz> [11]Sep-14

     [11] https://www.w3.org/2020/09/14-wot-discovery-minutes.html

   some minor typo in conversation identified

   one thing to thing for considering is using JSOS

   McCool: we no longer make decisions to make public minutes
   during minutes
   ... from now on, minutes are published as draft in the public
   mailing list
   ... everything that is said in minutes will be public
   ... therefore, today we just mark the minutes as official

   they are marked as official since no objections are presented

   McCool creates a new issue, which is basically about using JOSE
   in Directory service

   issue #71

   <kaz> [12]Issue 71 on JOSE

     [12] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/71


     [13] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/71

   McCool creates the issue to suggest using the JOSE in the API

   <McCool> [14]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/71

     [14] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/71

   no more follow up from the minutes

   <kaz> [15]RFC7520

     [15] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7520

Edge computing PoC

   McCool: ...edge workers PoC for W&N is something interesting to
   work with. We should aim at considering this

TPAC agenda review

   we move to talk about TPAC Agenda

   <inserted> [16]vF2F wiki

     [16] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/F2F_meeting,_October_2020

   McCool: ...during the week agenda will be created, any
   ... TPAC is allocated during 5 days
   ... anyone with conflicts or preferences for those days?

   Cristiano has a conflict for the 22 of October

   McCool: ...then, 20 or 21 will be picked

   <kaz> [17]vF2F agenda and conflicts

     [17] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/F2F_meeting,_October_2020#Agenda

   McCool: the 20th of October is the chosen day
   ... ...there are 3 hours allocated for discovery
   ... ...then, 20 min for discussion
   ... if nobody brings any question, issues will be reviewed
   ... each slot is already assigned, please be aware

   Andrea: where is the template?

   McCool: it is located in the WoT github under PRESENTATIONS
   ... in the 2020-10-online-f2f folder

   (McCool prepares the slide set, uploads it to GitHub, and
   updates the template)

   McCool: material outside the template, is not a problem as long
   as it is clear and available

   <kaz> [18]presentation template

     [18] https://github.com/w3c/wot/blob/master/PRESENTATIONS/2020-10-online-f2f/Template-2020-06-DD-WoT-Session-Presenter.potx

   <McCool> [19]vF2F presentation area

     [19] https://github.com/w3c/wot/tree/master/PRESENTATIONS/2020-10-online-f2f

   McCool: ...in TPAC there are also join meetings
   ... some security issues have been created for the meeting,
   MEIG and PUB are join meetings that are related with the
   security issues
   ... for other issues that you may think are relevant for that
   meeting, label the issue with PUB or MEIG or the entity

   <kaz> [20]wot repo issues for the joint meeting agenda

     [20] https://github.com/w3c/wot/issues?q=is:issue+is:open+label:agenda

   McCool: meeting are short, therefore, issues will be
   ... issue #65 in wot-discovery should be reviewed, and the
   issue about signing TDs (all these related to the DID label)
   ... let's move on on the agenda
   ... for the plugfest we need to have a discussion to decide
   what to have
   ... it is basically next week, if you can make the plugfest
   ... if you have homework, try to have it for Wednesday (meeting
   ... workflow probably will rely on creating TDs, and
   registering in Link Smart deployment
   ... we need to ensure that someone is running the Link Smart

   Now meeting moves to next agenda item


   <inserted> [21]PR 70

     [21] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/pull/70

   first is #70 from Toumura-san

   the PR is accepted and merged with no objections

   <inserted> [22]PR 47

     [22] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/pull/47

   next one is #47 from Andrea

   Andrea: unfortunately, I could not rebase the project

   McCool: I will add my review
   ... ...do you guys mind to have the discovery meeting during
   the plugfest?
   ... ...since no objection is presented, next week we will have
   the regular meeting of discovery
   ... ...likely during TPAC, we will need to cancel the meeting
   of th 5th

   <kaz> [23]vF2F time table

     [23] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/F2F_meeting,_October_2020#Timetable_for_WoT_PlugFest_and_vF2F_during_TPAC

   McCool adds the information about meetings (cancelation dates,
   and new dates) on the wiki

   McCool: 28th of Sep remains untouched, October 5th is
   cancelled, and also October 19th
   ... 12th of October is held, unless there is a conflict
   ... October 26 meeting will be postpone

   <inserted> [24]Cancellation plan

     [24] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/WG_WoT_Discovery_WebConf#Cancellations


   Now meeting moves to next agenda item, issues

   McCool: sequence diagrams, recently they have been added to the
   Architecture draft, I suggest to use the same tool

   (issue [25]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/69)

     [25] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/69)

   McCool: ...we want to look tools. plantUML used in discovery
   ... ...I was discussing in architecture meeting the necessity
   of having high-level diagrams for describing the process
   ... we should try to have such higher level diagrams

   <kaz> [26]wot-discovery - 5.3 DNS-Based Service Discovery

     [26] https://w3c.github.io/wot-discovery/#introduction-dns-sd

   McCool: ...from now on, let's use the plantUML for diagrams
   ... generated images are under wot-discovery/images
   ... upload also the source files

   <kaz> [27]example source code of PlantUML for discovery

     [27] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/blob/master/images/sequence-dnssd-directory.puml

   McCool: we should include more than only 2 actors in the
   diagrams (Producer, Directory, Consumer, Third-Party service)
   ... format to upload the images should be svg
   ... png is nice, but has quality loss
   ... let's upload both .svg and .png images, but the main one
   will be .svg (recall uploading also the .puml file)

   <kaz> kaz: note that we've been using SVG for our specs and PNG
   also as fallback

   (McCool updates the README with a plantUML reference)

   <kaz> [28]updated README

     [28] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/tree/master/images

   McCool creates an issue, for considering the use of WoT
   Directories for discovering compute services and utilities
   (related to Edge Workers)

   issue #72, [29]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/72

     [29] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/72

   no more issues to talk about, time is finished for the meeting.
   For next time, review issue #53

   <McCool> [30]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/53

     [30] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/53

   <kaz> [adjourned]

Summary of Action Items

Summary of Resolutions

   [End of minutes]

    Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by
    David Booth's [31]scribe.perl version ([32]CVS log)
    $Date: 2020/09/28 11:07:53 $

     [31] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
     [32] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Monday, 28 September 2020 11:11:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 28 September 2020 11:11:30 UTC