- From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 16:00:04 +0900
- To: public-wot-ig@w3.org, public-wot-wg@w3.org
available at: https://www.w3.org/2020/09/02-wot-pf-minutes.html also as text below. Thanks a lot for taking the minutes, Cristiano! Kazuyuki --- [1]W3C [1] http://www.w3.org/ WoT Plugfest/Testing 02 Sep 2020 [2]Agenda [2] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/PlugFest_WebConf#Agenda_09.02.2020 Attendees Present Kaz_Ashimura, Michael_McCool, Cristiano_Aguzzi, Daniel_Peintner, Ege_Korkan, Kunihiko_Toumura, Ryuichi_Matsukura, Tomoaki_Mizushima Regrets Chair McCool Scribe cris_ Contents * [3]Topics 1. [4]Review agenda 2. [5]GitHub issues * [6]Summary of Action Items * [7]Summary of Resolutions __________________________________________________________ Review agenda McCool: is anybody have any PR or other things ? <Ege> [8]TUM devices online [8] https://esiremotelab.esi.ei.tum.de/ Ege: (mentions TUM's online devices now our devices are live ... we also have a live camera feed McCool: do you have the link? Ege: sure ... we also probably publish just a link to these TDs McCool: could you please add that link in the repo ? ... we have three weeks to organize ... so we really need to fill these TDs ... also a directory is really critical ... aside from the directory service do you have any other tools? ... or a proxy service? Matsukura: yeah we have a proxy service McCool: we should document that in the tool folder, but maybe we can create a more specific folder where to describe this ... please use the created md file to document your services GitHub issues <kaz> [9]Issue 47 [9] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/47 McCool: I believe we'll have SPARQL support in our TDD so it is better that TDs will be annotated with semantic tags ... we'll annotate them using ODM semantics <kaz> [10]Issue 39 [10] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/39 Ege: I think I fixed #39, It probably was a problem in the ontology ... it wasn't a failure in the context, you have to look specifically if it was there or not ... I mean we hadn't tests for this scenario McCool: so I'll the issue open to track this need Ege: issue 43 it is some ideas bring from wot McCool: it is quite old, it is from two years ago ... it is a long document and I am not sure if the content is really meaningful <kaz> [11]Issue 43 [11] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/43 Ege: I liked the outcomes mentioned in the original issue. The sentence used there are pretty marketable . we should use them McCool: please, extract the useful stuff and put in the marketing repo. Ege: Ok, but I think we should do this after each plugfest ... I mean reporting the good outcomes. McCool: ok I marked the issue as outcome ... issue #44 is too pretty old. I feel that we can close the issue <kaz> [12]Issue 44 [12] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/44 <kaz> [13]Issue 45 [13] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/45 McCool: issue 45 is missing the text. I'm comping the referenced text ... it seems that is not really an issue Ege: it is similar to 43. it is just an outcome McCool: I'll create a label just for that: informative ... plugfest outcome is too informative ... Ok I have another meeting. I think we need to collect TDs as quickly as possible <kaz> [adjourned] Summary of Action Items Summary of Resolutions [End of minutes] __________________________________________________________ Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by David Booth's [14]scribe.perl version ([15]CVS log) $Date: 2020/09/23 06:59:05 $ [14] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm [15] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Wednesday, 23 September 2020 07:00:10 UTC