W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wot-wg@w3.org > September 2020

[PlugFest/Testing] minutes - 2 September 2020

From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 16:00:04 +0900
Message-ID: <87v9g52d1n.wl-ashimura@w3.org>
To: public-wot-ig@w3.org, public-wot-wg@w3.org
available at:

also as text below.

Thanks a lot for taking the minutes, Cristiano!



      [1] http://www.w3.org/

                          WoT Plugfest/Testing

02 Sep 2020


      [2] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/PlugFest_WebConf#Agenda_09.02.2020


          Kaz_Ashimura, Michael_McCool, Cristiano_Aguzzi,
          Daniel_Peintner, Ege_Korkan, Kunihiko_Toumura,
          Ryuichi_Matsukura, Tomoaki_Mizushima





     * [3]Topics
         1. [4]Review agenda
         2. [5]GitHub issues
     * [6]Summary of Action Items
     * [7]Summary of Resolutions

Review agenda

   McCool: is anybody have any PR or other things ?

   <Ege> [8]TUM devices online

      [8] https://esiremotelab.esi.ei.tum.de/

   Ege: (mentions TUM's online devices
   now our devices are live
   ... we also have a live camera feed

   McCool: do you have the link?

   Ege: sure
   ... we also probably publish just a link to these TDs

   McCool: could you please add that link in the repo ?
   ... we have three weeks to organize
   ... so we really need to fill these TDs
   ... also a directory is really critical
   ... aside from the directory service do you have any other
   ... or a proxy service?

   Matsukura: yeah we have a proxy service

   McCool: we should document that in the tool folder, but maybe
   we can create a more specific folder where to describe this
   ... please use the created md file to document your services

GitHub issues

   <kaz> [9]Issue 47

      [9] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/47

   McCool: I believe we'll have SPARQL support in our TDD so it is
   better that TDs will be annotated with semantic tags
   ... we'll annotate them using ODM semantics

   <kaz> [10]Issue 39

     [10] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/39

   Ege: I think I fixed #39, It probably was a problem in the
   ... it wasn't a failure in the context, you have to look
   specifically if it was there or not
   ... I mean we hadn't tests for this scenario

   McCool: so I'll the issue open to track this need

   Ege: issue 43 it is some ideas bring from wot

   McCool: it is quite old, it is from two years ago
   ... it is a long document and I am not sure if the content is
   really meaningful

   <kaz> [11]Issue 43

     [11] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/43

   Ege: I liked the outcomes mentioned in the original issue. The
   sentence used there are pretty marketable . we should use them

   McCool: please, extract the useful stuff and put in the
   marketing repo.

   Ege: Ok, but I think we should do this after each plugfest
   ... I mean reporting the good outcomes.

   McCool: ok I marked the issue as outcome
   ... issue #44 is too pretty old. I feel that we can close the

   <kaz> [12]Issue 44

     [12] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/44

   <kaz> [13]Issue 45

     [13] https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/issues/45

   McCool: issue 45 is missing the text. I'm comping the
   referenced text
   ... it seems that is not really an issue

   Ege: it is similar to 43. it is just an outcome

   McCool: I'll create a label just for that: informative
   ... plugfest outcome is too informative
   ... Ok I have another meeting. I think we need to collect TDs
   as quickly as possible

   <kaz> [adjourned]

Summary of Action Items

Summary of Resolutions

   [End of minutes]

    Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by
    David Booth's [14]scribe.perl version ([15]CVS log)
    $Date: 2020/09/23 06:59:05 $

     [14] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
     [15] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Wednesday, 23 September 2020 07:00:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 23 September 2020 07:00:11 UTC