W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wot-wg@w3.org > September 2020

[wot-discovery] minutes - 7 September 2020

From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 18:47:34 +0900
Message-ID: <87d02f31hl.wl-ashimura@w3.org>
To: public-wot-wg@w3.org
available at:
  https://www.w3.org/2020/09/07-wot-discovery-minutes.html

also as text below.

Thanks,

Kazuyuki

---
   [1]W3C

      [1] http://www.w3.org/

                               - DRAFT -

                             WoT Discovery

07 Sep 2020

   [2]Agenda

      [2] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/WG_WoT_Discovery_WebConf#7_September_2020

Attendees

   Present
          Kaz_Ashimura, Michael_McCool, Christian_Glomb,
          Farshid_Tavakolizadeh, Kunihiko_Toumura,
          Tomoaki_Mizushima, Cristiano_Aguzzi

   Regrets

   Chair
          McCool

   Scribe
          kaz

Contents

     * [3]Topics
         1. [4]Agenda
         2. [5]Prev minutes
         3. [6]TPAC vF2F planning
         4. [7]Schedule for FPWD
         5. [8]PR62
         6. [9]PR61
         7. [10]PR51
         8. [11]PR60
     * [12]Summary of Action Items
     * [13]Summary of Resolutions
     __________________________________________________________

   <scribe> scribenick: kaz

Agenda

   Farshid: mentions some trouble with ReSpec

   Kaz: suggests we don't use fragment URL for workaround

   McCool: or local reference?

   [14]respec issues

     [14] https://github.com/w3c/respec/issues

Prev minutes

   [15]Aug-31

     [15] https://www.w3.org/2020/08/31-wot-discovery-minutes.html

   McCool: (goes through the minutes)
   ... any comments on the minutes?

   (none)

   McCool: approved

   [16]Aug-17

     [16] https://www.w3.org/2020/08/17-wot-discovery-minutes.html

   McCool: bunch of issues
   ... Farshid, did we create an issue accordingly?

   Farshid: guess we did

   McCool: ok
   ... any objections to approve the minutes?

   (none)

   McCool: approved

TPAC vF2F planning

   McCool: f2f is coming up
   ... PlugFest as well
   ... also joint sessions
   ... we should create issues on topics for: DID, Privacy,
   JSON-LD
   ... any existing issues to be marked as well?

   Farshid: possible meeting with T2TRG on JSONPath?

   McCool: good question
   ... there is an issue on JSONPath

   [17]Issue 56 on JSONPath

     [17] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/56

   McCool: (adds a comment to issue 56)

   [18]new comment for issue 56

     [18] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/56#issuecomment-688355217

   (possible joint meeting with T2TRG)

   [19]Issue 54 - Need to define context for added vocabulary

     [19] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/54

   McCool: can close it?

   Farshid: not yet done

   McCool: ok, still an open issue
   ... should create an issue in wot-thing-description for this
   ... combination scheme is still under discussion

   <FarshidT> link:
   [20]https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/issues/617

     [20] https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/issues/617

   [21]Issue 24 - Consider how to sign TDs in a directory service

     [21] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/24

   McCool: related to DID

   [22]Issue 17- Compare Query and Filter approaches

     [22] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/17

   McCool: maybe can be closed
   ... (adds a label of "T2TRG")

   [23]Issue 2

     [23] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/2

   McCool: (adds a label of "PING")
   ... another problem with how to deal with JSON-LD fragments in
   query responses

   Farshid: exists for XPath, JSONPath and SPARQL

   McCool: (creates a new issue)
   ... for the joint meeting with JSON-LD

   [24]Issue 63

     [24] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/63

   [25]Issue 64 - XPath queries of vocabulary using namespaces

     [25] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/64

   McCool: (and updates the comments on that issue)

   [26]new comments

     [26] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/64

   McCool: we need to define DID introduction
   ... (creates a new issue on that)
   ... (and adds a label of "DID" to the new issue)

   [27]Issue 65

     [27] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/65

   McCool: need to think about which DID methods are applicable

   (and then creates another issue of "Consider overlap in DID and
   Directory functionality)

   [28]Issue 66

     [28] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/66

   <McCool>
   [29]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is
   %3Aopen+label%3ADID

     [29] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues?q=is:issue+is:open+label:DID

   <McCool>
   [30]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is
   %3Aopen+label%3AJSON-LD

     [30] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues?q=is:issue+is:open+label:JSON-LD

   McCool: issues relate to DID and JSON-LD above

   [31]Issue 11 - Update Two-Phase proposal

     [31] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/11

   McCool: (adds a comment)

   [32]comment added to Issue 11

     [32] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/11#issuecomment-688367362

   McCool: (adds some more comments)

   [33]new comments

     [33] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/11#issuecomment-688367844

   McCool: Privacy issues?

   [34]Issues with "PING" label

     [34] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues?q=is:issue+is:open+label:PING

   [35]Issue 67 - new issue on directory API proposal

     [35] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/67

Schedule for FPWD

   McCool: FPWD in September 2020

PR62

   [36]PR 62

     [36] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/pull/62

   McCool: any objections to merge this?

   (none)

   McCool: (merged)

PR61

   [37]PR 61

     [37] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/pull/61

   McCool: need to negotiate with the Architecture TF

   Farshid: terms to be listed alphabetically

PR51

   Farshid: think this is done

   [38]8.2.2.3

     [38] https://pr-preview.s3.amazonaws.com/farshidtz/wot-discovery/pull/51.html#exploration-directory-api-notification

   scribe:

   McCool: any concerns to merge PR 51?

   (none)

   (PR51 merged)

PR60

   [39]PR 60

     [39] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/pull/60

   McCool: Toumura-san's PR reviewed by Farshid
   ... (adds some comments)

   [40]McCool's new comment

     [40] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/pull/60#discussion_r484482153

   tou: how to identify the discovery service server?

   McCool: just use "_wot" for everything
   ... and _directory._sub._wot for directory APIs

   Farshid: the information is available only during the search

   [41]McCool's proposal

     [41] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/pull/60#issuecomment-688381570

   McCool: please review the issue

   [adjourned]

Summary of Action Items

Summary of Resolutions

   [End of minutes]
     __________________________________________________________


    Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by
    David Booth's [42]scribe.perl version ([43]CVS log)
    $Date: 2020/09/14 14:08:13 $

     [42] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
     [43] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Monday, 21 September 2020 09:47:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 21 September 2020 09:47:39 UTC