- From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2020 17:17:59 +0900
- To: public-wot-wg@w3.org
available at:
https://www.w3.org/2020/09/21-wot-discovery-minutes.html
also as text below.
Thanks a lot for taking the minutes, Andrea!
Kazuyuki
---
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
WoT Discovery
21 Sep 2020
[2]Agenda
[2] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/WG_WoT_Discovery_WebConf#21_September_2020
Attendees
Present
Kaz_Ashimura, Andrea_Cimmino, Michael_McCool,
Kunihiko_Toumura, Cristiano_Aguzzi, Tomoaki_Mizushima
Regrets
Christian_Glomb
Chair
McCool
Scribe
andrea_cimmino
Contents
* [3]Topics
1. [4]Prev minutes
2. [5]Edge computing PoC
3. [6]TPAC agenda review
4. [7]PRs
5. [8]Issues
* [9]Summary of Action Items
* [10]Summary of Resolutions
__________________________________________________________
<kaz> scribenick: andrea_cimmino
Prev minutes
Meeting starts reviewing the minutes
<kaz> [11]Sep-14
[11] https://www.w3.org/2020/09/14-wot-discovery-minutes.html
some minor typo in conversation identified
one thing to thing for considering is using JSOS
McCool: we no longer make decisions to make public minutes
during minutes
... from now on, minutes are published as draft in the public
mailing list
... everything that is said in minutes will be public
... therefore, today we just mark the minutes as official
they are marked as official since no objections are presented
McCool creates a new issue, which is basically about using JOSE
in Directory service
issue #71
<kaz> [12]Issue 71 on JOSE
[12] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/71
[13]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/71
[13] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/71
McCool creates the issue to suggest using the JOSE in the API
<McCool> [14]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/71
[14] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/71
no more follow up from the minutes
<kaz> [15]RFC7520
[15] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7520
Edge computing PoC
McCool: ...edge workers PoC for W&N is something interesting to
work with. We should aim at considering this
TPAC agenda review
we move to talk about TPAC Agenda
<inserted> [16]vF2F wiki
[16] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/F2F_meeting,_October_2020
McCool: ...during the week agenda will be created, any
conflicts?
... TPAC is allocated during 5 days
... anyone with conflicts or preferences for those days?
Cristiano has a conflict for the 22 of October
McCool: ...then, 20 or 21 will be picked
<kaz> [17]vF2F agenda and conflicts
[17] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/F2F_meeting,_October_2020#Agenda
McCool: the 20th of October is the chosen day
... ...there are 3 hours allocated for discovery
... ...then, 20 min for discussion
... if nobody brings any question, issues will be reviewed
... each slot is already assigned, please be aware
Andrea: where is the template?
McCool: it is located in the WoT github under PRESENTATIONS
folder
... in the 2020-10-online-f2f folder
(McCool prepares the slide set, uploads it to GitHub, and
updates the template)
McCool: material outside the template, is not a problem as long
as it is clear and available
<kaz> [18]presentation template
[18] https://github.com/w3c/wot/blob/master/PRESENTATIONS/2020-10-online-f2f/Template-2020-06-DD-WoT-Session-Presenter.potx
<McCool> [19]vF2F presentation area
[19] https://github.com/w3c/wot/tree/master/PRESENTATIONS/2020-10-online-f2f
McCool: ...in TPAC there are also join meetings
... some security issues have been created for the meeting,
MEIG and PUB are join meetings that are related with the
security issues
... for other issues that you may think are relevant for that
meeting, label the issue with PUB or MEIG or the entity
<kaz> [20]wot repo issues for the joint meeting agenda
[20] https://github.com/w3c/wot/issues?q=is:issue+is:open+label:agenda
McCool: meeting are short, therefore, issues will be
prioritized
... issue #65 in wot-discovery should be reviewed, and the
issue about signing TDs (all these related to the DID label)
... let's move on on the agenda
... for the plugfest we need to have a discussion to decide
what to have
... it is basically next week, if you can make the plugfest
call
... if you have homework, try to have it for Wednesday (meeting
day)
... workflow probably will rely on creating TDs, and
registering in Link Smart deployment
... we need to ensure that someone is running the Link Smart
Now meeting moves to next agenda item
PRs
<inserted> [21]PR 70
[21] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/pull/70
first is #70 from Toumura-san
the PR is accepted and merged with no objections
<inserted> [22]PR 47
[22] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/pull/47
next one is #47 from Andrea
Andrea: unfortunately, I could not rebase the project
McCool: I will add my review
... ...do you guys mind to have the discovery meeting during
the plugfest?
... ...since no objection is presented, next week we will have
the regular meeting of discovery
... ...likely during TPAC, we will need to cancel the meeting
of th 5th
<kaz> [23]vF2F time table
[23] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/F2F_meeting,_October_2020#Timetable_for_WoT_PlugFest_and_vF2F_during_TPAC
McCool adds the information about meetings (cancelation dates,
and new dates) on the wiki
McCool: 28th of Sep remains untouched, October 5th is
cancelled, and also October 19th
... 12th of October is held, unless there is a conflict
... October 26 meeting will be postpone
<inserted> [24]Cancellation plan
[24] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/WG_WoT_Discovery_WebConf#Cancellations
Issues
Now meeting moves to next agenda item, issues
McCool: sequence diagrams, recently they have been added to the
Architecture draft, I suggest to use the same tool
(issue [25]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/69)
[25] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/69)
McCool: ...we want to look tools. plantUML used in discovery
... ...I was discussing in architecture meeting the necessity
of having high-level diagrams for describing the process
... we should try to have such higher level diagrams
<kaz> [26]wot-discovery - 5.3 DNS-Based Service Discovery
[26] https://w3c.github.io/wot-discovery/#introduction-dns-sd
McCool: ...from now on, let's use the plantUML for diagrams
... generated images are under wot-discovery/images
... upload also the source files
<kaz> [27]example source code of PlantUML for discovery
[27] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/blob/master/images/sequence-dnssd-directory.puml
McCool: we should include more than only 2 actors in the
diagrams (Producer, Directory, Consumer, Third-Party service)
... format to upload the images should be svg
... png is nice, but has quality loss
... let's upload both .svg and .png images, but the main one
will be .svg (recall uploading also the .puml file)
<kaz> kaz: note that we've been using SVG for our specs and PNG
also as fallback
(McCool updates the README with a plantUML reference)
<kaz> [28]updated README
[28] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/tree/master/images
McCool creates an issue, for considering the use of WoT
Directories for discovering compute services and utilities
(related to Edge Workers)
issue #72, [29]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/72
[29] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/72
no more issues to talk about, time is finished for the meeting.
For next time, review issue #53
<McCool> [30]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/53
[30] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/53
<kaz> [adjourned]
Summary of Action Items
Summary of Resolutions
[End of minutes]
__________________________________________________________
Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by
David Booth's [31]scribe.perl version ([32]CVS log)
$Date: 2020/09/28 14:09:10 $
[31] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
[32] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Monday, 5 October 2020 08:18:05 UTC