- From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 16:17:02 +0900
- To: public-wot-wg@w3.org
available at:
https://www.w3.org/2020/11/16-wot-discovery-minutes.html
also as text below.
Thanks a lot for taking the minutes, Andrea!
Kazuyuki
---
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
- DRAFT -
WoT Discovery
16 Nov 2020
[2]Agenda
[2] https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/WG_WoT_Discovery_WebConf#16_November_2020
Attendees
Present
Kaz_Ashimura, Andrea_Cimmino, Christian_Glomb,
Cristiano_Aguzzi, Farshid_Tavakolizadeh,
Kunihiko_Toumura, Michael_McCool, Tomoaki_Mizushima
Regrets
Chair
McCool
Scribe
andrea_cimmino
Contents
* [3]Topics
1. [4]Minutes
2. [5]Issues
* [6]Summary of Action Items
* [7]Summary of Resolutions
__________________________________________________________
<kaz> scribenick: andrea_cimmino
Minutes
<kaz> [8]Nov-9
[8] https://www.w3.org/2020/11/09-wot-discovery-minutes.html
meeting starts reviewing the minutes from the previous call on
Nov 9 and the vTPAC
first the ones from the 2020/11/09
<kaz> approved
<kaz> [9]vTPAC minutes
[9] https://www.w3.org/2020/10/05-22-wot-minutes.html
syntactic search review from TPAC slides
McCool: we should clarify short applies both JSON Path and
XPath
... ....put space between words connected with &
... ....any comments in the syntactic query session?
no comments in regards of syntactic search
<kaz> (fixed the typos)
Andrea: ....maybe the distributed search among TDDs was the
most interesting part
McCool: ...federation could be an optional feature maybe
Andrea: ... but in the case of the TDDs I think the federation
as it is is not as suitable as an ad-hoc discovery algorithm
mccool creates an issue for the further discussion on this
topic
Farshid: are there two ways of federation?
McCool: we need to check the specification
all the issues and questions about this topic are included in
the issue created
<FarshidT> [10]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/34
[10] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/34
Issue #97
issue link: [11]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/97
[11] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/97
mccool creates another issue with the necessity of having a
model for the directory
this issue is directly related with the federation one
<FarshidT> [12]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/30
[12] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/30
link to the issue of the information module
[13]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/98
[13] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/98
<cris_> [14]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/18
[14] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/18
mccool is grouping a set of related issues under the issue
number #98
McCool: ...another issue is how to summarize the information
stored in a TDD registered in another semantic issue that could
be interesting is the validation, should we use shapes?
McCool: ...maybe that is too much, we have Json schema
Cristiano: ...maybe we could have a semantic and a syntactic
level of validation?
mccool creates a new issue to discuss this matter
link to the issue:
[15]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/99
[15] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/99
<McCool> [16]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/99
[16] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/99
<kaz> kaz: maybe something more than what Playground does. so
agree we should re-define validation for WoT Discovery
currently, LinkSmart is not using SPARQL
McCool: is somebody else working on another?
Andrea is working on one, and Cristiano also will work on that
very likely
this finishes the TPAC meeting minutes review
<McCool> proposal: discovery sections of the TPAC 2020 minutes
are now suitable for release
RESOLUTION: discovery sections of the TPAC 2020 minutes have
been reviewed by the Discovery TF and are now suitable for
release
Issues
<inserted> [17]Issue 79
[17] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/79
now the group reviews the issues
McCool: one issue is the dynamic injection of values into TDs
Andrea: I have a publication on that
... the link for the publication
[18]https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/3/822
[18] https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/3/822
several members from the Discovery TF agree that the dynamic
injection should not be mandatory
<kaz> [19]McCool's new comments
[19] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/79#issuecomment-728147288
<McCool> [20]https://github.com/w3c/wot-security/issues/196
[20] https://github.com/w3c/wot-security/issues/196
McCool added a new security issue for Thing Model, do we want
to have mandatory security requirements for TDD?
McCool: ...this could lead to DoS attacks
... ...we could mitigate this
... ..by rate limit of queries from an entity
rate limiting*
Farshid: maybe we could have the mitigation apart from the
implementation
McCool: we can write down the mitigation as pointers
this discussion is written down in issue #96
issue link: [21]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/96
[21] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/96
<McCool> [22]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/86
[22] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/86
meeting is finished
Summary of Action Items
Summary of Resolutions
1. [23]discovery sections of the TPAC 2020 minutes have been
reviewed by the Discovery TF and are now suitable for
release
[End of minutes]
__________________________________________________________
Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by
David Booth's [24]scribe.perl version ([25]CVS log)
$Date: 2020/11/17 07:13:07 $
[24] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
[25] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Tuesday, 17 November 2020 07:17:07 UTC