[wot-discovery][DRAFT] minutes - 9 November 2020

available at:
  https://www.w3.org/2020/11/09-wot-discovery-minutes.html

also as text below.

Thanks a lot for taking the minutes, Farshid!

Kazuyuki

---
   [1]W3C

      [1] http://www.w3.org/

                               - DRAFT -

                             WoT Discovery

09 Nov 2020

Attendees

   Present
          Kaz_Ashimura, Michael_McCool, Christian_Glomb,
          Kunihiko_Toumura, Farshid_Tavakolizadeh,
          Tomoaki_Mizushima, Cristiano_Aguzzi

   Regrets

   Chair
          McCool

   Scribe
          FarshidT

Contents

     * [2]Topics
         1. [3]Minutes
     * [4]Summary of Action Items
     * [5]Summary of Resolutions
     __________________________________________________________

   <kaz> scribenick: FarshidT

Minutes

   <kaz> [6]vTPAC minutes

      [6] https://www.w3.org/2020/10/05-22-wot-minutes.html

   <kaz> [7]Oct-12 minutes

      [7] https://www.w3.org/2020/10/12-wot-discovery-minutes.html

   McCool: will go through TPAC minutes. This will probably take a
   whole hour. Let's review the Oct-12 minutes first.
   ... "fix error" should be changed to "fix respec errors"
   ... no objections, publishing the discovery minutes.
   ... next is TPAC minutes
   ... ToC links are not working

   Kaz: there was a typo. Fixed now.

   McCool: who is Joshue108?

   Kaz: that is Josh O Connor from the W3C Team

   McCool: wondering about how to describe the scribes' names

   Kaz: scribe names follow the IRC nicknames

   McCool: typo: rought

   Kaz: fixed

   McCool: geospatial queries are complicated. Have to organize a
   call with them.
   ... well-know -> well-known
   ... add "for example" before "an ip address"

   Kaz: fixed both

   McCool: "we have consider" -> "we have been considering"

   Kaz: done

   McCool: sensible -> sensitive

   Kaz: fixed

   McCool: we gotta use TDD consistently. This was done well in
   the minutes.

   Kaz: "verified credentials" -> "Verifiable Credentials"

   McCool: "this topic" -> discussion on use during other stages

   <inserted> kaz: fixed

   McCool: what does "active" mean?
   ... it is about life cycle. Does "active" mean registered and
   ready to respond? Need to clarify. Making an issue.

   [8]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/91

      [8] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/91

   McCool: described the issue on github.
   ... trusty -> trusted
   ... Creating a github issue for the point raised by kaz related
   to trustability, response time, etc

   [9]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/92

      [9] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/92

   Farshid: it is also about directories that are meant as
   different registries. E.g. manufactured things vs operational
   things.

   McCool: describing the issue on Github

   Cristiano: this was also raised in TD call. Link above

   McCool: going through Thing Model issue
   ... ben has downvoted, need to ask why

   Farshid: why no keep the example TD instead of TD Model? The
   current example TD contains example security definitions.

   Cristiano: TD Model spec may be extended to also allow model
   templating.

   McCool: need to consider our use case in TD discussions
   (comment on github issue)

   Issue: [10]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/86

     [10] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/86

   McCool: restfull -> RESTful
   ... adding an issue for JSON Lines ([11]https://jsonlines.org/)

     [11] https://jsonlines.org/)

   [12]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/93

     [12] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/93

   McCool: json-line -> JSON Lines
   ... updating the QUIC / HTTP/3 issue
   ([13]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/84)
   ... Web Transport WG?

     [13] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/84)

   Kaz: that WG is expected to discuss how to apply QUIC to
   applications

   McCool: W3C API

   Kaz: this is about API design and pagination to access the W3C
   DB

   McCool: commenting on issue
   [14]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/16
   ... PATCH complications
   ... creating an issue

     [14] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/16

   [15]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/94

     [15] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/94

   Kaz: we still need two implementations for optional features as
   well.

   Farshid: the spec is already there, treating objects as plain
   JSONs

   Cristiano: the protocol is fine. The request body may not be
   JSON-LD

   McCool: stopping at Syntactic queries section
   ... will continue the minutes review next week
   ... merging PR [16]https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/pull/89

     [16] https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/pull/89

   closing

   McCool: more cancellations in December

   <kaz> [17]We'll continue the minutes review from the topic on
   "Syntactic Queries"

     [17] https://www.w3.org/2020/10/05-22-wot-minutes.html#day3-item09

   <kaz> [adjourned]

Summary of Action Items

Summary of Resolutions

   [End of minutes]
     __________________________________________________________


    Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by
    David Booth's [18]scribe.perl version ([19]CVS log)
    $Date: 2020/11/16 08:40:30 $

     [18] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
     [19] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/

Received on Monday, 16 November 2020 08:54:55 UTC